Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo: Jacobs Beat Golovkin By Two or Three Points!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Canelo: Jacobs Beat Golovkin By Two or Three Points!

    Last month, Mexican superstar Saul "Canelo" Alvarez was a very interested party last month, when Gennady Golovkin defending his IBF, WBC, WBA, IBO middleweight titles against mandatory challenger Daniel Jacobs. Before a packed crowd at New York's Madison Square Garden, Golovkin saw the end of the twelfth round for the first time in his long career. He won a very close twelve round unanimous decision with scores of 114-113, 115-112, 115-112.


    [Click Here To Read More]
    Last edited by BIGPOPPAPUMP; 04-06-2017, 03:55 AM.

  • #2
    Then he should have no problem signing a contract for the fight!

    Comment


    • #3
      This is gonna be good.

      Comment


      • #4
        120-108 nelo C'mon, that KD was a fluke.

        Comment


        • #5
          loool so canelo thinks jacobs won the fight by 3-4 rounds?

          Comment


          • #6
            GGG was in one close fight and now they are just coming out of the wood work.

            2 or 3 points lol.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by soul_survivor View Post
              loool so canelo thinks jacobs won the fight by 3-4 rounds?
              Is this Canelos way of acknowledging that Lara took him to school?

              Comment


              • #8
                PAC beat floyd about same margin .
                Nelos trolling now. Don't nelo want to be first to beat GGG?

                Comment


                • #9
                  lol ducknelo is full of ****. you got schooled by a small old feather fisted welterweight. couldn't even win a single round now that's real.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Spoon agrees with Canelo's views on this, and that Pac beat Mayweather 116-112.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP