Why is Khan still seen as such a good fighter?

[dibzvincent143]

And the first few rounds against alvarez wasn't all that too. I get it they're giving him credit for his balls. But he wasn't doing great stuffs there, all pitty pat punches. No solid jab and confusing feints. Non stop movement coz Alvarez is slow on his feet. And khan could've won that if floyd jr is using his body. Lol

[LetOutTheCage]

I don't think he is still seen as a good fighter. Fast hands mean very little when you have poor timing, a glass chin and underwhelming power.

[Reloaded]

He impressed me vs Maidana, for once he survived the storm and beat up a real threat in Maidana.

Maidana had personal problems going on into that fight, I,ll try and find what it was its vague I cant remember the deal.

[Scary]

Floyd cleverly ducked Khan, but the maidana fight was just as good, if not better.

[Scary]

Let me put this differently. He has a style that should be a nightmare against styles of pure boxing.

[bambam182]

Khan being a big draw is fake news. It's a myth, nothing more.

bigger then your boyfriends krusher and GGG.

[mani1]

You could say the same about Porter who's he ever beaten to be any thing much?

He even needed the judges help to get a draw against Julio Diaz.

As for the biggest hype job ever Broner lol what's his best win?

The bum barely beat if that a shot to **** Paulie lol.

[HarvardBlue]

Khan has a lot of talent but his chin is weak and his focus during a fight is questionable. He also has a sneaky way of using underhanded tactics to gain an advantage.

[Uncle Rodge]

He's not a-murica-n

[Uncle Rodge]

Maidana had personal problems going on into that fight, I,ll try and find what it was its vague I cant remember the deal.

Indeed. He'd been through a terrible argument with his parents and spent more time staring wistfully through ceiling high widows on their estate than training.