Golovkin vs Alvarez won't happen until Golovkin loses that 0

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Lester Tutor
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2015
    • 17673
    • 365
    • 253
    • 22,224

    #1

    Golovkin vs Alvarez won't happen until Golovkin loses that 0

    "I spoke to my promoter Tom... 50/50..."

    This came from Golovkin himself. This guy is a man, he knows well what "half and half" means...

    Therefore, why would Golovkin take anything less than 50/50? What power does Oscar or Tom have what Golovkin feels is right?

    Ever since Golovkin was handed the green strap the ggg fans have been enjoying the K2 and GGG ride, they have been playing around in wanting Alvarez.

    Only way ggg will ever submit to anything different than 50/50 is when they lose that 0.
    Last edited by Lester Tutor; 04-03-2017, 10:36 AM.
  • GGG Gloveking
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Apr 2016
    • 12382
    • 658
    • 193
    • 189,439

    #2
    I never knew the purse bid was 50-50

    Comment

    • Lester Tutor
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2015
      • 17673
      • 365
      • 253
      • 22,224

      #3
      Originally posted by GGG Gloveking
      I never knew the purse bid was 50-50
      "Yesss...this is box... Canelo disrespect to boxing, he no share PPV 50/50. You know.. this crazy... I want to fight to Canelo. Has be everything 50/50... this box. This biggest fight. Wilder hasssa better KO than me. Hasssa!"

      Do you know what a hassa is Frank?

      Comment

      • The Big Dunn
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 70640
        • 10,139
        • 8,321
        • 287,568

        #4
        I disagree. GGG's primary value to a Canelo/GGG PPV is being an undefeated "monster" that nobody has defeated. Should he lose, especially if it's to someone perceived to be "lesser" than Canelo, it would significantly reduce the "sellability" of the PPV IMO.
        Last edited by The Big Dunn; 04-03-2017, 11:03 AM.

        Comment

        • GGG Gloveking
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Apr 2016
          • 12382
          • 658
          • 193
          • 189,439

          #5
          Originally posted by Mirko Troll Cop
          "Yesss...this is box... Canelo disrespect to boxing, he no share PPV 50/50. You know.. this crazy... I want to fight to Canelo. Has be everything 50/50... this box. This biggest fight. Wilder hasssa better KO than me. Hasssa!"

          Do you know what a hassa is Frank?
          A Hassa is a pig that don't fly straight.

          Styles P

          Comment

          • GGG Gloveking
            Undisputed Champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Apr 2016
            • 12382
            • 658
            • 193
            • 189,439

            #6
            Originally posted by Mirko Troll Cop
            "Yesss...this is box... Canelo disrespect to boxing, he no share PPV 50/50. You know.. this crazy... I want to fight to Canelo. Has be everything 50/50... this box. This biggest fight. Wilder hasssa better KO than me. Hasssa!"

            Do you know what a hassa is Frank?
            And none of that addresses thefact that Canelo had the belt, and the financial upside, yet he vacated his belt and handed it to GGG. So, what you're saying is it's ok for Camel to duck because he wants 90%, but not OK for Golovkin to want half

            Comment

            • FrankieClutch
              OTSC
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2009
              • 6084
              • 177
              • 396
              • 26,671

              #7
              Originally posted by The Big Dunn
              I disagree. GGG's primary value to a Canelo/GGG PPV is being an undefeated "monster that nobody has defeated. Should he lose, especially if it's to someone perceived to be lesser" than Canelo, it would significantly reduce the "sellability" of the PPV IMO.
              I came here to say this. The fight would lose a lot of luster if either of them lose before they fight each other.

              Comment

              • Lester Tutor
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2015
                • 17673
                • 365
                • 253
                • 22,224

                #8
                Originally posted by GGG Gloveking
                And none of that addresses thefact that Canelo had the belt, and the financial upside, yet he vacated his belt and handed it to GGG. So, what you're saying is it's ok for Camel to duck because he wants 90%, but not OK for Golovkin to want half
                The narratives aren't about vacating. Ironically it's been Abel, ggg, and Loeffler pursuing a fight and calling Nelo's name... who's desperate and wanting 50/50?

                Comment

                • Lester Tutor
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • May 2015
                  • 17673
                  • 365
                  • 253
                  • 22,224

                  #9
                  Originally posted by FrankieClutch
                  I came here to say this. The fight would lose a lot of luster if either of them lose before they fight each other.
                  Nelo be Chavez Jr. will be a success. GBP is in a very comfortable position. ESPN Deportes (that includes Marquez) have been talking about GGGs low #s against Jacobs. How many people are tuning into that program? Don't you think these Hispanic boxing fans are learning something about these narratives from Marquez and team, about low numbers?

                  The phase has already gone into affect and I knew this in 2016. Alvarez vs Chavez Jr. has more weight than Alvarez vs Golovkin atm.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP