Boxing is a sport. Winning rounds is part of the game. If a round is even, try and steal it at the end.
end of round flurries? Overrated, over pointed
Collapse
-
As people have already said in here, it really depends on what transpired beforehand in that round. if it was an even round and one guy throws a shoeshine, and lands some punches, I might give it to him. If he was getting outboxed for 2:30 and catching stiff jabs that were snapping his head back and then all of the sudden throws some arm punches to try and steal the round, I will give it to the guy who put in the more meaningful work in the round.Jacobs did this a lot during the GGG fight, calzaghe did this a lot through out his career, as did floyd.
The idea of making up for 80% of the round via the utilization of crowd pleasing flurries. These flurries are usually combinations which get the crowd going due to a lackluster fight.
I wouldn't be fooled if I was a judge, but why do judges reward this type of tactic so often? A flurry should never make up for being out boxed over an extended period of time. It just doesn't make any sense. Does the crowd influence this?Oscar was a master at it, so was B-Hop.Comment
-
There is def a dumb bias to it. If let's say it's an even round and a fighter flurries in the last ten seconds, that fighter wins the round. Let's say in the first 10 seconds of the round a fighter flurries, then it becomes even the rest of the round. We would consider it an even round. Even tho both situations the fighter flurries.Comment
-
Exactly. These flurries are never clean punches either. Degale also used them VERY wisely against Baau Jack, making round appear closer than they really were.There is def a dumb bias to it. If let's say it's an even round and a fighter flurries in the last ten seconds, that fighter wins the round. Let's say in the first 10 seconds of the round a fighter flurries, then it becomes even the rest of the round. We would consider it an even round. Even tho both situations the fighter flurries.Comment
-
Comment