Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Promoter Updates on Status of Billy Joe Saunders Fight

[aboutfkntime]

does anyone still listen to this clown ?

blah blah spin bullshht name-drop lies.....

then fight another no-hoper

rinse wash repeat

DO SOMETHING, you fkn losers

and STOP comparing Golovkin to Hagler

Golovkin would never have faced his opposition, even if they were superstars..... the guy who ran around for FOUR YEARS saying that he can fight at 154 no problem, but then refused to negotiate on weight with Cotto/Canelo, would not get in there with Leonard Hearns and Duran..... forget Mugabi, those clowns would have said that he bought nothing to the table

a big drama show, with no drama whatsoever LMAO

[Mammoth]

Daniel Jacobs!!!!!

[Progrssive_Jedi]

sitchu ass down loeffler u know u cant get away without giving that boy jacobs a reematch!!

jacobs messed up golvkins face with ease,,most ppl saw jacobs winning

Yea, because Jacobs was wearing shades because it's bright during those post fight conferences.

GGG didn't wear anything. He should of said, look, my face looks better than when I let that Brook guy hit me. Jacobs came in heavy and still couldn't faze GGG. Got out boxed.

Maybe his team shouldn't have demanded no rematch clause.

Agreed, he fought well but never really looking to hurt GGG, he was evasive to keep GGG from hurting him. Not fighting on Blackfoot with good counters but fighting on back foot to not get hurt

Oh, I smell what you're cooking.

"Blackfoot," was that on purpose.

[Metho_4u]

Because they're ****** people!

And you're one of a kind of ******! Cong****

[Progrssive_Jedi]

Nothing Funnier than a Clown calling World Champs No Hopers

Let me know when one of these guys wins a world title.

[esdotrock]

sitchu ass down loeffler u know u cant get away without giving that boy jacobs a reematch!!

jacobs messed up golvkins face with ease,,most ppl saw jacobs winning

What fight were you watching? 🙄

[Verus]

does anyone still listen to this clown ?

blah blah spin bullshht name-drop lies.....

then fight another no-hoper

rinse wash repeat

DO SOMETHING, you fkn losers

and STOP comparing Golovkin to Hagler

Golovkin would never have faced his opposition, even if they were superstars..... the guy who ran around for FOUR YEARS saying that he can fight at 154 no problem, but then refused to negotiate on weight with Cotto/Canelo, would not get in there with Leonard Hearns and Duran..... forget Mugabi, those clowns would have said that he bought nothing to the table

a big drama show, with no drama whatsoever LMAO

Yep. Yes indeed.

Hagler fought: Mustafa Hamsho, Thomas Hearns, Sugar Ray Leonard, John Mugabi, Vito Antuofermo, Roberto Duran, Benny Briscoe, Alan Minter and many more. Mugabi was the Mike Tyson of the middleweights...a very scary guy.

Golovkin fought: Jacobs and ???

[The Time]

If Loeffler is in constant contact with Warren then how come he doesn't know about the deadline he set.

Loeffler stop being a cuckold and get things done for Triple G. If you blow any of these deals it's going to look bad, and if you do I don't know what Golovkins contract is like with K2, but he should seek a different promoter when he's able to.

[boxingitis]

The deal is done, they are just waiting to announce it. They would be fools if they waited for Alvarez without any contract.

[hitking]

I've beat the drum forever for how pointless and meaningless GGG's belt quest is. His fans aren't gonna change my mind into believing that this nonsense is meaningful. I'm also never gonna convince the GGG faithful that this isn't some legendary quest this dude is supposedly on. I assume that as most mature as fight fans, they'll eventually realize that it isn't that big a deal.

That said, most post isn't to stir that pot. My post is really trying to gather information. My question is, when exactly did the WBO belt become meaningful enough to be deemed necessary in the "undisputed" equation? There was a time in the late 80s and early 90s, my adolescent and teen years, where I was really into the belts. I could tell you every beltholder in boxing. And in those days, all you needed to be considered undisputed was the WBC, WBA, and IBF. My first recollection of the WBO was when Ray Mercer fought Tommy Morrison. And that was even kinda seen as them hyping a fake belt for the great white hope. And even has recently as the early 00s, Tsyzu-Judah was considered for the undisputed jr welterweight title, without the WBO. Hopkins-Trinidad was for the undisputed middleweight title, with the WBO. The only fighter in the last two decades, outside of GGG of course, to hold the WBC, WBA, IBF trifecta and not be given the "undisputed" label was Roy Jones at light heavy. And that was mostly because Darius Mickelshcki was the lineal champ, not because he held the WBO belt. For all my knowledgeable fight fans out there. When did the WBO belt become relevant enough where an established, universally recognized Champion such as GGG. Who holds the WBC, WBA, and IBF belts. Needs a bum like Billy Joe Saunders to become undisputed, just because he has the WBO strap?