That's the least logical way to determine P4P rankings because if fighter X was the same size as fighter Z, fighter X's speed, power, coordination, etc would be completely different.
It's Chocolatito was 250 pounds for a hypothetical fight with Klitschko, a 250 pound Chocolatito would be nothing like the Chocolatito of reality. So the criteria you've listed is completely ridiculous.
The only logical way to rank fighters pound for pound is to rank them based on who is accomplishing more at their weight and showing the most dominance at their weight. Obviously Artur Szpilka would dominate Floyd Mayweather, but Floyd Mayweather is more dominant and accomplished at his weight than Szpilka is at his weight. Therefore, based on his accomplishments and dominance at his size, Mayweather should be ranked higher, pound for pound, than Szpilka.
There are 17 weight classes. Nobody is dominating their weight class more than GGG right now. He's undefeated. He's the clear #1. He has very recent wins over #2 and #3. He has all 3 of the 3 biggest titles. He rules over his division with an iron fist more than any other fighter does in their division.
Therefore, pound for pound, he is the #1 ranked fighter in the world. It's common sense.
Then it proves you're a casual, look it up, that's the meaning
Walters coming off a draw and one year of inactivity is better than icing Zlaticanin who was coming off 22 straight wins incuding that Ricky Burns and Redkach scalp?????
Yeah but look at Zlaticanin's record. Bunch of 5-7 records that no one cares about. Walters is a legit threat and he dismembered him to the point that he quit.
Comment