The TV networks do a terrible job of explaining to fans how the sport actually works.
The "why not?" is that Lemieux and Jacobs belong to enemy factions. Those with power rarely risk one of their fighters against a fighter they don't control unless a world championship or title shot is at stake.
So while you might feel the fight makes sense for Lemieux and Jacobs, it doesn't make sense for Oscar and it doesn't make sense for Haymon. And it really doesn't make sense for the fighters either because if they lose, they have no recourse really.
Then you have the fact that neither Oscar nor Haymon have GGG. So there's no guarantee the risk has any reward at all.
Unless there's a vacant title and these two guys are the highest available contenders for that particular organization, I don't see this fight happening. Doesn't make sense for anybody when you understand the leverage game that is the fight business.
The "why not?" is that Lemieux and Jacobs belong to enemy factions. Those with power rarely risk one of their fighters against a fighter they don't control unless a world championship or title shot is at stake.
So while you might feel the fight makes sense for Lemieux and Jacobs, it doesn't make sense for Oscar and it doesn't make sense for Haymon. And it really doesn't make sense for the fighters either because if they lose, they have no recourse really.
Then you have the fact that neither Oscar nor Haymon have GGG. So there's no guarantee the risk has any reward at all.
Unless there's a vacant title and these two guys are the highest available contenders for that particular organization, I don't see this fight happening. Doesn't make sense for anybody when you understand the leverage game that is the fight business.
Comment