Who's more ideally p4p #2, Kovalev or undefeated GGG?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • New England
    Strong champion.
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2010
    • 37514
    • 1,927
    • 1,486
    • 97,173

    #41
    Originally posted by BKM-
    A lot of pent up rage all just came out at once, didn't it my little snowflake? Keep that shit in the lounge where you're too scared to engage anymore.



    Life's tough. If you appear to be better technically it still doesn't mean as much when you're not beating the quality of opposition that another guy(who may appear to be less technically sound) is beating.

    The greatness of a boxer has always been mainly determined by the level of opposition he has beaten.




    REALISTIC imagination, not complete and utter fantasy pulled out of your cucked arse, pal.

    Comparing performances and quality of opponents between fighters of different weightclasses is nowhere near the ridiculous imagination required to think that "if everybody is the same size" they would all still be literally exactly the same fighters they would be in their own weightclass.

    Like you take a speedy RG and put him up against one of the giant HW's we have now. By your logic the HW RG would literally be 3 times faster. Literally 3 times, even if he's also 6'7/250lbs. And you're also not taking into account body types of shorter people(typical because you're a manlet yourself) they have much shorter limbs than the taller folks, yet this appears to be no issue either in your fantasy world. No sense of gravity and biology from your dumbass at all.

    Your observations and ideas on boxing are on the same level as your political ideas. You're a clown in every aspect.


    says the dude who called for a ****** genocide . my political views are total clownery, doe.



    a pound for pound list is exactly as i have described it. you make a subjective interpretation of a fighter's ability [ability to fight] regardless of size.


    all you're doing is asking who the best fighter on the planet is. then the second. then the third. how is that not an evaluation of who would beat other fighters based only on abiliyt and not on size? how are you not creating a playing field in which these guys would be matched against each other without the influence of size?

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP