Who's more ideally p4p #2, Kovalev or undefeated GGG?

[Metho_4u]

A lot of pent up rage all just came out at once, didn't it my little snowflake? Keep that shit in the lounge where you're too scared to engage anymore.



Life's tough. If you appear to be better technically it still doesn't mean as much when you're not beating the quality of opposition that another guy(who may appear to be less technically sound) is beating.

The greatness of a boxer has always been mainly determined by the level of opposition he has beaten.




REALISTIC imagination, not complete and utter fantasy pulled out of your cucked arse, pal.

Comparing performances and quality of opponents between fighters of different weightclasses is nowhere near the ridiculous imagination required to think that "if everybody is the same size" they would all still be literally exactly the same fighters they would be in their own weightclass.

Like you take a speedy RG and put him up against one of the giant HW's we have now. By your logic the HW RG would literally be 3 times faster. Literally 3 times, even if he's also 6'7/250lbs. And you're also not taking into account body types of shorter people(typical because you're a manlet yourself) they have much shorter limbs than the taller folks, yet this appears to be no issue either in your fantasy world. No sense of gravity and biology from your dumbass at all.

Your observations and ideas on boxing are on the same level as your political ideas. You're a clown in every aspect.

You seem special and that maybe you need to be educated.

From Wikipedia: "Pound for pound is a term used in combat sports such as boxing or mixed martial arts to reflect an assessment as to who the better fighters are, regardless of size (i.e., regardless of weight class). As these fighters do not compete directly, judging the best fighter pound for pound is subjective, and ratings vary."

wiktionary: "Adjective Edit
pound-for-pound (comparative more pound-for-pound, superlative most pound-for-pound)

(sports, boxing) A comparison of fighters' (usually boxers) skill levels, regardless of what weight class they are in.
Sugar Ray Robinson is pound for pound the best boxer ever."

Urban dictionary: is the term used in boxing, mixed martial arts and other combat sports to describe a fighter's value in relation to fighters of different weight classes.
Robinson was called the pound for pound best without being expected to beat much larger fighters, under the belief that he as a Middleweight was still a better quality fighter than any fighter fighting at heavier or lighter weights than him.

[Metho_4u]

Maybe now you get it... ignoramus

[BKM-]

You seem special and that maybe you need to be educated.

From Wikipedia: "Pound for pound is a term used in combat sports such as boxing or mixed martial arts to reflect an assessment as to who the better fighters are, regardless of size (i.e., regardless of weight class). As these fighters do not compete directly, judging the best fighter pound for pound is subjective, and ratings vary."

wiktionary: "Adjective Edit
pound-for-pound (comparative more pound-for-pound, superlative most pound-for-pound)

(sports, boxing) A comparison of fighters' (usually boxers) skill levels, regardless of what weight class they are in.
Sugar Ray Robinson is pound for pound the best boxer ever."

Urban dictionary: is the term used in boxing, mixed martial arts and other combat sports to describe a fighter's value in relation to fighters of different weight classes.
Robinson was called the pound for pound best without being expected to beat much larger fighters, under the belief that he as a Middleweight was still a better quality fighter than any fighter fighting at heavier or lighter weights than him.

You are a legit ****** calling others ******s? Pretty impressive. Learn how to read. Nowhere does it say "the best fighter if they all fought eachother while their abilities stayed the exact same even if they went up 100lbs and 2 feet of height".

You imbecile, comparing skills and records is a lot different than what new England was saying, and you're moronic enough to be on his side too while using information that supports MY side?

who the better fighters are, regardless of size (i.e., regardless of weight class).

Meaning you can't discriminate on size, which btw I always found factually BS because the bigger fighters the bigger the risk of the fight ending with 1 punch. The bigger guys deserve extra credit for competing under a more dangerous environment.

Robinson was called the pound for pound best without being expected to beat much larger fighters, under the belief that he as a Middleweight was still a better quality fighter

Again dummy, read carefully. Better quality fighter. Resume and skills are facts which determine quality. You don't use your fantasy to make SRR twice as big so he competes with a HW while he retains the exact same attributes he has at WW/MW. It's physically impossible and a low IQ way of thinking.

[Metho_4u]

You are a legit ****** calling others ******s? Pretty impressive. Learn how to read. Nowhere does it say "the best fighter if they all fought eachother while their abilities stayed the exact same even if they went up 100lbs and 2 feet of height".

You imbecile, comparing skills and records is a lot different than what new England was saying, and you're moronic enough to be on his side too while using information that supports MY side?



Meaning you can't discriminate on size, which btw I always found factually BS because the bigger fighters the bigger the risk of the fight ending with 1 punch. The bigger guys deserve extra credit for competing under a more dangerous environment.



Again dummy, read carefully. Better quality fighter. Resume and skills are facts which determine quality. You don't use your fantasy to make SRR twice as big so he competes with a HW while he retains the exact same attributes he has at WW/MW. It's physically impossible and a low IQ way of thinking.

Whatever loser, it just doesn't fit your argument, I owned your azz and now you're trying to come up with other excuses. Learn to read and research ****face

[techliam]

In my opinion, no.2 is Kovalev and Ward. No.1 is vacant until either gets a clear victory

[BKM-]

Whatever loser, it just doesn't fit your argument, I owned your azz and now you're trying to come up with other excuses. Learn to read and research ****face

Exactly as I thought, all bark no bite.

Sit down and keep your trap shut when adults are speaking little boy(although new england doesn't look like one, he is in fact an adult physically).

[Chuckguy]

I think GGG and Kova should be reminded what catchweights are for!

I think Abel should put his money at 170...

This loser wants to see GGG lose sooo bad. It's hilarious

[Lester Tutor]

This loser wants to see GGG lose sooo bad. It's hilarious

Why? He's nor better than Ward, Kovalev, or Alvarez, or 168. But it is fun to throttle industry roguesters and their agendas!

[Sugar Adam Ali]

One guy has beaten pascal, Hopkins, and razor thin loss to Ward


One guy barely won vs Jacobs

It's a Pretty obvious answer

[Metho_4u]

Exactly as I thought, all bark no bite.

Sit down and keep your trap shut when adults are speaking little boy(although new england doesn't look like one, he is in fact an adult physically).

LOL, what is my "bark"? The fact that you red K'd me shows you know I put your azz in its place, you don't like that i posted the definition? You don't like the definition? Well then little guy, don't discuss these things until you rid yourself of ignorance and learn.