Will Golovkin get the same criticism as Ward if he doesn't rematch Jacobs ASAP?

[i'm a fun haver]

GGG should be talking rematch. Now if he wants the Canelo fight to come off first he should publicly state that and then say Jacobs will get his rematch right after that.

GGG is a yes man, he does whatever his handlers say. And his handlers understandably don't want to jeopardize the Canelo payday. But GGG should still be talking about a rematch. Great fighters want to leave no doubt.

Again, Floyd has to be mentioned. He had two close fights his whole career and didn't hesitate a bit to immediately give rematches to Castillo and Madaina.

You know GGG is fighting Saunders in Kazakhstan in June, right?
They were working on it before he fought Jacobs
He's not going to sit out and wait until September to see if Canelo ducks again

[hugh grant]

Again, Floyd has to be mentioned. He had two close fights his whole career and didn't hesitate a bit to immediately give rematches to Castillo and Madaina.

Floyd thin ks he lost that's why he gave rematches. Other than that he tries
s makes fights boring so nobody wants to see him in rematch

[Nubia]

Floyd thin ks he lost that's why he gave rematches. Other than that he tries
s makes fights boring so nobody wants to see him in rematch

Yet....he holds the record for most PPV's sold....ever...

Boy you lot are dumb.

[hugh grant]

Yet....he holds the record for most PPV's sold....ever...

Boy you lot are dumb.

But Floyd still thinks he lost to maidana and castillo a d that's wshy he gave rematch. If Floyd thinks is it was close or controversial like against dlh and PAC that's not a reason to give rematch though. Floyd has too think he lost and the public think he lost also to giuve rematch
That's why GGG don't need to. He knows he beat Jacobs as do boxing fans

[b00g13man]

[DinoCop]

Because mein freund, Kovalev beat Ward as bad as GGG beat Jacobs and the judges made a wrong decision.

[j.razor]

Ggg won like Floyd does with jab. But ggg jabs snaped head. Floyd just touches you. Plus ggg was more busy with jab. Floyd just pot shots why is it OK for Floyd to win fight after fight like that but not for ggg?


Ggg fans don't mind giving rematch one day but not on basis it was controversial, rather it was exciting fight and we'd be up for seeing a repeat one day. Operative word being oneday

No Floyd hardly uses his jab, the most I've seen him use it last was against #48 and Floyd wins from landing clean punches while they miss almost every shot and if he "touches" you then why are his opponents so hesitant to come in? The only thing the 666 fight showed me was that 666 hits harder than Jacobs. Jacobs still outboxed him.

One day? How bout A.S.A.P. before all the excuses start to pile in...like he's too old.

[Dr Rumack]

The stakes aren't quite the same. Golovkin-Jacobs aren't #1 & #2 on pfp lists. Nor was it a fight that people wanted the way they wanted Ward-Kovalev. And finally Golovkin-Canelo overshadows it. That is what people have been focused on.

[hugh grant]

t The only thing the 666 fight showed me was that 666 hits harder than Jacobs. Jacobs still outboxed him.

.

Your trolling now. Jacobs was hard!y throwing so how can he be outboxing GGG? Every time Jacobs LA nded he raised his arms in air in joy. He raised his arms once.
It wasn't controversial. It was competitive though as I'm sure GGG worked hard, real hard for his standards to the point some people confuse it with being controversial. It wasn't controversial. If you consider that result controversial, decisions should no longer be allowed and be abolished, because its clear picking right winner is impossible and subjective. Jmm clearly beat Floyd as did nelo.

The on!y way to win in future is first fighter who can't continue, eiuther by ko or exhaustion

[j.razor]

Your trolling now. Jacobs was hard!y throwing so how can he be outboxing GGG? Every time Jacobs LA nded he raised his arms in air in joy. He raised his arms once.
It wasn't controversial. It was competitive though as I'm sure GGG worked hard, real hard for his standards to the point some people confuse it with being controversial. It wasn't controversial. If you consider that result controversial, decisions should no longer be allowed and be abolished, because its clear picking right winner is impossible and subjective. Jmm clearly beat Floyd as did nelo.

The on!y way to win in future is first fighter who can't continue, eiuther by ko or exhaustion

Your trolling. Why 666 aint look dominate like he does with low level fighters? Oh, Jacobs had something to do with it.