Will Golovkin get the same criticism as Ward if he doesn't rematch Jacobs ASAP?

[-Kev-]

Wtf? You have been exposed as a liar. Now sign out and give the account back to my friend kev.

Bat, Kessler did not want that work again. Stop it. When it came time for Ward to answer back, it was all crickets. Froch and Kessler preferred to fight each other. Understandably so.

[BattlingNelson]

Bat, Kessler did not want that work again. Stop it. When it came time for Ward to answer back, it was all crickets. Froch and Kessler preferred to fight each other. Understandably so.

You are lying. Stop it. Ward didn't want none. Court papers even say so, so leave it.

[TonyGe]

By all indicators GGG wants Saunders next in his home country.

Now he's just been in a tough fight in which many (including me) thought he lost. Why shouldn't he get the same criticism as Ward who is perceived (wrongly) to be ducking the Kovalev rematch?

Surely Golovkin wants to cement his credibility by putting all doubts to rest? Why is he not given the same level of criticism as Ward would be if he avoided the Kovalev rematch?

No. Ward signed a contract with a rematch clause in it. GGG didn't. Also Loefler and company stated several times that there was no rematch clause just to make sure everyone knows.

[TonyGe]

Jacobs should have said he wanted it immediately, instead of being a gentlemen. He gassed by the tenth round. That weight cut might be even harder at the end of the year, or next year. I'm surprised Golovkin didn't attack more, those last three rounds.

No Jacobs did the right thing for Golovkin and for himself. This allows him time to fight again while his stock is high. If he defeats somone like Eubank or another fighter with a good following a rematch with Golovkin would be a hot ticket.

[Metho_4u]

Yet I think Floyd should give PAC his rematch befoire GGG even entertains idea of giving jacoibs one.

Floyd not giving one armed fighter rematch is real evil

LOL! Here we go with this **** again

[Metho_4u]

Floyd
Floyd wanted to a venge loss that's why he wanted rematch.
GGG goit decision in hometown boys backyard. He got nothing to prove. Jacoibs tried, he fell short

Lmao! Again! You puzzyhole

[hugh grant]

Lmao! Again! You puzzyhole

F!oyd v Castillo and maidana were far more controversial than DJ and 3g.

3g v DJ was not controversial. For 3g standards it was a competitive fight. But it is a case of whether you thing Jacobs won either 3 or 4 rounds

[nveleven]

Yes. Yes he will.
In a parallel universe where Jacobs dropped GGG early, and rocked him again late in an otherwise competitive fight, then of course, you race-baiting sack of ****.

[j.razor]

No. Close but comfortable. Not controversial. Ward was robbery decision.

Ward clearly put that work in that kovalev couldn't handle and Jacobs out boxed 666.

[Raonic]

The GGG-Jacobs fight wasn't as controversial as the Ward-Kovalev won so it won't be the same treatment and rightfully so.