More Controversial: GGG/Jacobs or Canelo/Lara

[O Prophet]

Which fight was more controversial in your opinion Golovkin vs Jacobs last night or Canelo vs Lara?

[Dean_Razorback]

canelo lara was an awful fight.

[bigdunny1]

Not even close you saw nothing like what is going on to GGG after the Lara fight. Lara ran from canelo got booed all night and fans were disgusted no one wanted to see it again. Lara rep was hurt. No demand for a rematch because lara stank up the joint. Here the backlash is on GGG and everyone is praising Jacobs. The fact Jacobs increased his value in the loss and Lara didn't says it all.

[Ganondorf]

Lara clearly beat Canelo.

[jmrf4435]

The two should not be mentioned together.


Canelo Lara was way more boring, and Lara didn't really do much

[-PBP-]

Canelo vs Lara produced one of the worst scorecards in the history of boxing. I have no problem with Canelo winning but holy ****.

Last night all of the scorecards were reasonable.

[Hype job]

Neither, both were very close fights.

[Lester Tutor]

Lara vs Canelo took 35 years to make

[gmc_rfc_06]

Lara stopped working after 4 rounds and getting hit to the body, it became a few pot shots per round. There was a very visible shift when the body attack began.

Golovkin-Jacobs followed the same path throughout; Golovkin having success with the jab, Jacobs with power shots.

Both close fights that clearly divide opinion.

[ramses07]

canelo lara had one guy trying to win and the other guy just trying to do the minimum to win

jacobs ggg had two guys trying to win; no way did jacobs move as much as its being said on here