Show me your updated P4P list

[Motorcity Cobra]

I've never had Roman Gonzalez on my P4P because he lacks defense. He's a fun fighter to watch but you gotta have defense to be on the P4P list.

Ward
Kovalev
Pacquiao
Crawford
M. Garcia
Lomachenko

Those are the only 5 fighters I see that separate themselves from the pack. The last 5 are interchangeable.

[Vegemil]

1. Lemonchenko
2. Ward
3. Mikey Garcia
4. Kovalev
5. Golovkin
Idk can't think straight right now all I could think of. Rigo could be switched in somewhere but he's a little too inactive for my tastes so I can't judge him properly.

[Sledgeweather17]

Is this ish based on raw talent or actual resume? Coz I don't know what Keith Thurman has to do to make anyone p4p list at this point. Does beating Porter and Danny mean nothing?

[Vegemil]

Is this ish based on raw talent or actual resume? Coz I don't know what Keith Thurman has to do to make anyone p4p list at this point. Does beating Porter and Danny mean nothing?

Me personally, I create my p4p list based off of how good I think a fighter is. Take Mikey for example. I wholeheartedly think if he was the same weight as Thurman, he could smoke him. The fighter's resume is important to solidify their skillset but for me it's more up to the eye test than anything.

[NEETzsche]

Lomachenko and Crawford are the only ones who dominated their toughest opponent recently, so they're my #1 and #2. Actually, Usyk did too, but he still needs just a little more depth on his resume to break top five

[Motorcity Cobra]

1. Lemonchenko
2. Ward
3. Mikey Garcia
4. Kovalev
5. Golovkin
Idk can't think straight right now all I could think of. Rigo could be switched in somewhere but he's a little too inactive for my tastes so I can't judge him properly.

Rigo is too inactive to make my list. His age may have caught up to him but we don't know because he never fights.

[sunny31]

I think Lomachenko and Crawford are the two best fighters on the planet currently - they just have to prove a bit more, but I expect them to do just that.

Andre Ward is not the fighter he was - but still top 5. Kovalev I would put in the top 5 also, but I couldn't put him above the two guys above. Roman for his accomplishments would round out my top 5. You can't say a guy fighting up in his 4th weight division and struggling a bit more because of the fact that he is fighting bigger naturally stronger guys should be penalised, his career defines why they made the term.

[Vegemil]

Rigo is too inactive to make my list. His age may have caught up to him but we don't know because he never fights.

I put him there tentatively in the bottom 5 because when he shows up to an arena he sets up shop and puts on a clinic.

[JoeKidd]

Pacquiao (He's not dead folks!)
Lomachenko (Too much skills.)
Bradley (No shame to lose to Pacquiao.)
Crawford (Skills but unproven to me.)

All the rest...nothing special. GGG was my #1 prior to last night's exposure. And Andre Ward's a piece of what Kovalev said.

[Vegemil]

I think Lomachenko and Crawford are the two best fighters on the planet currently - they just have to prove a bit more, but I expect them to do just that.

Andre Ward is not the fighter he was - but still top 5. Kovalev I would put in the top 5 also, but I couldn't put him above the two guys above. Roman for his accomplishments would round out my top 5. You can't say a guy fighting up in his 4th weight division and struggling a bit more because of the fact that he is fighting bigger naturally stronger guys should be penalised, his career defines why they made the term.

Yeah I don't rate Crawford as highly just yet but he has the potential and can only get better at this point in his career.