Can you people explain what fight you were watching?

[Madison Boxing]

A lot of people watched the fight with black tinted glasses

[animelive]

A lot of people watched the fight with black tinted glasses

In all seriousness, Jacobs did well. He used his height and reach to his advantage. But he also *****ed out of ibf weigh in. Even then at the end of the fight, GGG looked fresh while Jacobs looked like he was in a gangfight.
Even if we ignore the volume of punches, nothing Jacobs put out hurt golovkin so even with outweighing GGG, he got dropped. Can't really see how people are making a strong case for him.

[Madison Boxing]

In all seriousness, Jacobs did well. He used his height and reach to his advantage. But he also *****ed out of ibf weigh in. Even then at the end of the fight, GGG looked fresh while Jacobs looked like he was in a gangfight.
Even if we ignore the volume of punches, nothing Jacobs put out hurt golovkin so even with outweighing GGG, he got dropped. Can't really see how people are making a strong case for him.

people see what they want to see. they are so desperate for him to lose that they start seeing things that didnt happen. it was a competitive fight but clear win. even in the write up on this site they say that.

[nauti4life85]

the only difference is ggg landed teh much better punches in an otherwise close fight where floyd against pac and ward against kovalev did not but these same fanboys defended those decisions to the death. this is why they have no credibility.

Floyd beat Pac more clear than GGG vs Jacobs and Kov vs Ward. You can't sit up here and say "GGG landed the better punches" then in the same damn sentence say Floyd basically didn't vs Pac ..

GGG vs Jacobs was competitive with a clear win for GGG, more or less like Thurman vs Porter not the other two fights you mentioned. Kov beat Ward's ass and anyone that scored that fight for Ward is a fanboy point blank period.