If there was no scoring "miscalculation"....

[MetalVomit]

There'd be no robbery either way, but I thought Barrera did enough to win. Very similar to Hatton-Collazo that way, although it was a little more difficult to score...Hatton-Collazo was easy.

how did you score the hatton collazo fight?

[mECHsLAVE]

how did you score the hatton collazo fight?

6-6, Hatton by a point. And that's me giving every benefit of the doubt to Collazo that I could. It was just as close a fight, but there should be less controversy becuase the Hatton-Collazo rounds were fairly easy to score.

Barrera-Juarez had a couple close rounds that were hard to score.

[psychopath]

...would people still claim robbery? It was a very close fight, that could have went either way. I think a draw was sufficient, and this scoring miscalculation is bull****. However, if there was no scoring problem, and initially Barrera won the split decision, would anyone be crying 'robbery'?

That fight was so close but Barrera still got he edge. It could have been a draw or a victoty for Mab that's how I saw it.

That's not a robbery and definitely there's no scoring miscalculation. The two judges saw the 12th round as a 10/9 round for Rocky so that's how it should stay. But what makes it controversial is the goddam boxing commision stepping right there and change the 12th round scoring by the two judges.

An immediate rematch could have been the call of the day rather than tampering with the judges score cards in front of everybody's faces.

[MetalVomit]

That fight was so close but Barrera still got he edge. It could have been a draw or a victoty for Mab that's how I saw it.

That's the way I saw it as well, especially after watching it again, sober

[RAESAAD]

That's the way I saw it as well, especially after watching it again, sober

LOL.....me too.