Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Sanchez: If Jacobs is Cautious, GGG Methodically Beats Him Down

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
    I still say Jacobs' best chance of winning this fight is to bum rush GGG by backing him up. Gennady has a bullying, hunting type fighting style. You can't win a fight running from a bully. You have to stand up to a bully.

    In this case, he is going to have to hunt the hunter. GGG is fearless and all balls. Therefore, Jacobs is going to have to go all balls deep in this fight in order to defeat a fighter like Gennady Golovkin.

    Given his pedigree, he is too fundamentally sound in order to out box. Others have tried in the past but failed. Therefore, Danny is going to have hit him first, hard and very often.
    damn, **** just got real in here.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Kigali View Post
      Grow up you corny casual.
      lol... this is your best line! And you had to think about it too! ... I know it s hard having the ability to give a comeback when you re a little dim, and i m not asking for something witty or anything but... still ... re lol

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Mequetrefe View Post
        Oh no, here we go again. 10 plus pages of arguments.
        No here we go again with his ****** Sanchez

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by martinringer View Post
          GGG is no legend and Canelo is far ahead of GGG in results and fame and a draw for the fan base. GGG offers little to Americans or Mex's. Charlo might actually beat GGG as would Ward. DUH?
          Dude there are four active legends in the sport. Paquiao, Cotto, Marquez, and Klitschscko. That is it. I have never considered GGG a legend, he didn't have the benefit those guys had when you spend the better part of your career stuck in limbo fighting in casino's in places like Panama and Montenegro like he was forced too its hard to make up for that time. Could he have been? Maybe but by the time the masses heard of him he was around 28 or so and finally broke through in the U.S. only to have Dibella say he wouldn't let him face Martinez. I think Golovkin is of a very special pedigree and possibly the only olympic level fighter that got dissed by the american market as long as he did. At least Kovalev broke through younger because of Main Event but he too had similar circumstances and ended up having to fight for free. Its effed up but that's how the cards get dealt sometimes cuz. Much like the basketball legends we know from around the way that never made it...just a bunch of what could've been's.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Sadiqkingofko View Post
            I'm not sure how Golovkin can out jab him tbh, Jacobs has 3 inch reach advantage and can defend the jab unlike Lemieux, so Golovkin should come out quick attack the body and try to land the left hook to the head, or just wait until Jacobs makes a mistake and time him
            Shorter reach guys can still work effectively behind a jab if they have timing and footwork, and if they have a great hard jab.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by turnedup View Post
              Dude there are four active legends in the sport. Paquiao, Cotto, Marquez, and Klitschscko. That is it. I have never considered GGG a legend, he didn't have the benefit those guys had when you spend the better part of your career stuck in limbo fighting in casino's in places like Panama and Montenegro like he was forced too its hard to make up for that time. Could he have been? Maybe but by the time the masses heard of him he was around 28 or so and finally broke through in the U.S. only to have Dibella say he wouldn't let him face Martinez. I think Golovkin is of a very special pedigree and possibly the only olympic level fighter that got dissed by the american market as long as he did. At least Kovalev broke through younger because of Main Event but he too had similar circumstances and ended up having to fight for free. Its effed up but that's how the cards get dealt sometimes cuz. Much like the basketball legends we know from around the way that never made it...just a bunch of what could've been's.
              listen dim bulb as Cotto is no legend and neither is Marquez. Klit had a nice 10 yr run against bums before throwing the Fury debacle farce fight. Pac is a legend and Canelo is on his way. GGG could follow with actually beating a name and Jacobs is a start though not a great fighter. But be careful dimmy bulb in calling Cooto and little Juan a legend it makes you look dumb. DUH?

              Comment


              • #37
                Notice how Sanchez mentioned ending it with a bodyshot? Don't say I didn't tell you so when it happens.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by martinringer View Post
                  listen dim bulb as Cotto is no legend and neither is Marquez. Klit had a nice 10 yr run against bums before throwing the Fury debacle farce fight. Pac is a legend and Canelo is on his way. GGG could follow with actually beating a name and Jacobs is a start though not a great fighter. But be careful dimmy bulb in calling Cooto and little Juan a legend it makes you look dumb. DUH?
                  Marquez isn't a living legend, nor is Cotto? Yet Canelo who hasn't done 1/10th of what they have is on his way? Holy shhhh...we'll just end this here and i'll perma-block you because my man you showed that you don't know absolutely shhh about boxing beyond your own p*ssy agenda. Calling Canelo a legend in the making with TWO notable fights on his entire resume is absolutely motherfking hilarious! Seriously 2 fights in what now 50 fights...that is hilarious my man. Go put up a poll on this website and ask outright if Cotto and Marquez are legends or not you might be shocked at the results you imbecile product of fandom.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by mathed View Post
                    Notice how Sanchez mentioned ending it with a bodyshot? Don't say I didn't tell you so when it happens.
                    Jacobs leaves it all open when he fires shots. Both his body and face are meat against Golovkin's fists.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by turnedup View Post
                      Marquez isn't a living legend, nor is Cotto? Yet Canelo who hasn't done 1/10th of what they have is on his way? Holy shhhh...we'll just end this here and i'll perma-block you because my man you showed that you don't know absolutely shhh about boxing beyond your own p*ssy agenda. Calling Canelo a legend in the making with TWO notable fights on his entire resume is absolutely motherfking hilarious! Seriously 2 fights in what now 50 fights...that is hilarious my man. Go put up a poll on this website and ask outright if Cotto and Marquez are legends or not you might be shocked at the results you imbecile product of fandom.
                      Listen dim bulb Marquez is a bit above average no where near great and Cotto is a battered brain dead nothing. The great Mexican Aztec warrior god Antonio Viva' Margarito battered Cotto bloody and left that greasy little poorto Rican slumped and bloody almost dead in a corner. You probably study for a urine test. dim bulb. take up ice skating.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP