Comments Thread For: Sanchez: If Jacobs is Cautious, GGG Methodically Beats Him Down

[Kigali]

I'm not sure how Golovkin can out jab him tbh, Jacobs has 3 inch reach advantage and can defend the jab unlike Lemieux, so Golovkin should come out quick attack the body and try to land the left hook to the head, or just wait until Jacobs makes a mistake and time him

I see you're rooting against the American fighter.

Typical illegal immigrant.

[SteveM]

I'm not sure how Golovkin can out jab him tbh, Jacobs has 3 inch reach advantage and can defend the jab unlike Lemieux, so Golovkin should come out quick attack the body and try to land the left hook to the head, or just wait until Jacobs makes a mistake and time him

Andre Dirrell's reach is 2 inches longer than Jacob's. Nothing that Golovkin hasn't seen before. Plus Dirrell has better feet and body movement than Jacobs.

[Kigali]

Andre Dirrell's reach is 2 inches longer than Jacob's. Nothing that Golovkin hasn't seen before. Plus Dirrell has better feet and body movement than Jacobs.

But Dirrell isn't as dangerous as Jacobs.

[martinringer]

who actually crowned GGG as a boxing great or legend?? dumb

Listen up and learn. GGG is a good boxer just not great and far from a legend. Who has GGG actually beat that is considered great or even really good? Fricking no one. GGG has to beat some legends to be consdiered in the great category. Do not buy into all that commie bull ship and fake propaganda on GGG. GGG is a very good boxer who has actually beaten no one great. Let the commiesa believe this GGG crap as aMERICANS ARE TOO SMART AND WISE.

[Sadiqkingofko]

I see you're rooting against the American fighter.

Typical illegal immigrant.

stfu mother ****er, who you calling an illegal immigrant??? I served in this military and saved american lives, so stfu before I make you

[Sadiqkingofko]

Andre Dirrell's reach is 2 inches longer than Jacob's. Nothing that Golovkin hasn't seen before. Plus Dirrell has better feet and body movement than Jacobs.

You mean back in 2004 Olympics??? Damn bro Golovkin was still 22 back then, he ain't nearly as sharp as he was back then

[turnedup]

Listen up and learn. GGG is a good boxer just not great and far from a legend. Who has GGG actually beat that is considered great or even really good? Fricking no one. GGG has to beat some legends to be consdiered in the great category. Do not buy into all that commie bull ship and fake propaganda on GGG. GGG is a very good boxer who has actually beaten no one great. Let the commiesa believe this GGG crap as aMERICANS ARE TOO SMART AND WISE.

What legend is he supposed to beat? LOL There are no legends at 154, 160, or even 168.

[martinringer]

What legend is he supposed to beat? LOL There are no legends at 154, 160, or even 168.

Beating Canelo and Charlo and Ward would legitimize the overrated GGG.

[vaynardevil]

Listen up and learn. GGG is a good boxer just not great and far from a legend. Who has GGG actually beat that is considered great or even really good? Fricking no one. GGG has to beat some legends to be consdiered in the great category. Do not buy into all that commie bull ship and fake propaganda on GGG. GGG is a very good boxer who has actually beaten no one great. Let the commiesa believe this GGG crap as aMERICANS ARE TOO SMART AND WISE.

no legend between 154-168 now, only canelo the 1st middleweight champ who vacated the belt, legendary achiev indeed

he'll be 1 if he beat jacobs and saunders

[martinringer]

no legend between 154-168 now, only canelo the 1st middleweight champ who vacated the belt, legendary achiev indeed

he'll be 1 if he beat jacobs and saunders

If GGG can dismantle and KO Canelo and Charlo then say a Eubank or a DeGale then label GGG as an all time great worthy of greatness.