its pathetic how jacobs name has been dragged through the mud...

[HanzGruber]

i see you are all ducking my question. if golovkins so overrated and hyped, why doesnt jacobs have a chance to beat him? If not, who at 168 or 160 is the guy whos gonna beat golovkin? Cause im confused, how can he be overhyped but you dont seem to give anyone a chance against him?

lol at you trying to change the subject.. still not owning up to your flip flopping huh

[Madison Boxing]

lol at you trying to change the subject.. still not owning up to your flip flopping huh

that was the question in the original post which you all avoided.

[creekrat77]

Mr zitback was using

Idk just seems like that doesn't prove anything at all. I mean it's nothing like getting caught taking an IV flushing your body with 700ml of saline a day before the fight. For someone that walks around at 150lbs, I never knew shedding 3lbs of water weight would drain you to such dangerous levels...

[NaijaD]

that was the question in the original post which you all avoided.

You need to tell us why you went from saying Jacobs has no chance to heralding him as a serious threat in a couple of months...

Who did Jacobs recently beat to make you think he was suddenly so much better, his best win was well over a year ago. This **** you pull is embarrassing man but that's what happens when you have an agenda: you get exposed for flip flopping regularly.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

lol at you trying to change the subject.. still not owning up to your flip flopping huh

that was the question in the original post which you all avoided.

The only one ducking here is you. Ducking your flip flopping. But that's OK cause no matter how much you try to play it off here, we got your other thread where your flip flopping is even more evident.

[Madison Boxing]

You need to tell us why you went from saying Jacobs has no chance to heralding him as a serious threat in a couple of months...

Who did Jacobs recently beat to make you think he was suddenly so much better, his best win was well over a year ago. This **** you pull is embarrassing man but that's what happens when you have an agenda: you get exposed for flip flopping regularly.

dont answer a question with a question bro.

[yammy25]

that was the question in the original post which you all avoided.

Nobody bigged jacobs up apart from two notorious posters. Thats not everyone.

That'll stay fact until you post quotes from users other than those showing that they were saying GGG was ducking who are now saying otherwise.

Anyone with any credibility on this site has chosen GGG for the win, and I havent seen anyone caling jacobs a bum, theyve been saying he has a punchers chance and is maybe a live dog but Golovkin has the skillset and power to beat him.

That doesnt mean people are saying GGG is a bum, nor does it mean you get to say he's amazing for beating jacobs. Jacobs is B level, Golovkin is A level. It might not be golovkins fault that he hasnt faced an A-level fighter, but the fact is he hasnt...

you dont get to award him p4p status or say he's amazing because the talentpool in his weight division has no A level or elite level fighters, it's the same for any fighter in that situation.

There's the answer you crave. And for the record, i prefer a golovkin win.

[Madison Boxing]

The only one ducking here is you. Ducking your flip flopping. But that's OK cause no matter how much you try to play it off here, we got your other thread where your flip flopping is even more evident.

ive already explained my comments regarding larrys sig. it was hyperbole and said in the heat of the moment about him having no chance against golovkin, was a throwaway comment. but you lot can cling to it if you like.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

You need to tell us why you went from saying Jacobs has no chance to heralding him as a serious threat in a couple of months...

Who did Jacobs recently beat to make you think he was suddenly so much better, his best win was well over a year ago. This **** you pull is embarrassing man but that's what happens when you have an agenda: you get exposed for flip flopping regularly.

It's not just flip flopping either. He also makes up **** like in his Loma and Washington thread. As if the evidence isn't there.

[Madison Boxing]

Nobody bigged jacobs up apart from two notorious posters. Thats not everyone.

That'll stay fact until you post quotes from users other than those showing that they were saying GGG was ducking who are now saying otherwise.

Anyone with any credibility on this site has chosen GGG for the win, and I havent seen anyone caling jacobs a bum, theyve been saying he has a punchers chance and is maybe a live dog but Golovkin has the skillset and power to beat him.

That doesnt mean people are saying GGG is a bum, nor does it mean you get to say he's amazing for beating jacobs. Jacobs is B level, Golovkin is A level. It might not be golovkins fault that he hasnt faced an A-level fighter, but the fact is he hasnt...

you dont get to award him p4p status or say he's amazing because the talentpool in his weight division has no A level or elite level fighters, it's the same for any fighter in that situation.

There's the answer you crave. And for the record, i prefer a golovkin win.

i dont get it though, cause they tell me ggg's not beaten anyone of note, but they are so sure the second best middleweight only has a punchers chance? THread after thread i ask them who actually do they think could beat golovkin and it goes quiet, but they pop up saying hes overhyped and overrated. as i keep saying, if hes so overrated, why do these same posters seem to give no other fighter any chance against him? i swear they rate him more highly than i do