Comments Thread For: Hopkins: Jacobs Will Beat Golovkin - A Big Upset is Coming!

[Reloaded]

Wow he might lose to a clinch happy p4per 2 divisions up. That doesn't count against his historic Mw defense record tho. Who are you kidding, you know GGG would murder the guy if they were same size

Its not size its skillset, Ward is not Wade I believe Andre beats him at any weight they can both make.

[GMAN SUPREME]

Jacobs chin is his weakest link and GGG will explore that. The duration of the fight depends on Jacobs chin.

it will be a quick exploration.

[aboutfkntime]

What part of the record is fake? Last I checked those were all legit wins with no controversy.

Don't worry, i'll wait.

legit wins don't break Hopkins record, legit title defences do

the WBA interim title ?

that fake " title " only exists because of greed/corruption

The WBA have promised to phase out those fake titles in favor of having one champion..... so, IF Golovkin beats Jacobs - and he likely will - the WBA interim title will cease to exist.....

..... meaning that when Golovkin " breaks " Hopkins record..... he will have done so by defending a title that no longer exists..... which is yea, fkn lame

the WBA promised to phase out those fake titles for a reason, so why support that rubbish by recognizing them now?

diminishing the standards within boxing is disrespectful both to the sport and to the fighters, past and present

[GMAN SUPREME]

Its not size its skillset, Ward is not Wade I believe Andre beats him at any weight they can both make.

without his size ward wouldn't be able to use his clinching tactics. golovkin beats him if they were the same size. at 168 I like his chances it wont be an easy fight for ward. this is all hypothetical though it will never happen ward is now at light heavyweight and he has kovalev problems lol

[GMAN SUPREME]

legit wins don't break Hopkins record, legit title defences do

the WBA interim title ?

that fake " title " only exists because of greed/corruption

The WBA have promised to phase out those fake titles in favor of having one champion..... so, IF Golovkin beats Jacobs - and he likely will - the WBA interim title will cease to exist.....

..... meaning that when Golovkin " breaks " Hopkins record..... he will have done so by defending a title that no longer exists..... which is yea, fkn lame

the WBA promised to phase out those fake titles for a reason, so why support that rubbish by recognizing them now?

diminishing the standards within boxing is disrespectful both to the sport and to the fighters, past and present

regardless, golovkin will break the record eventually. he's been wba super champ for awhile. what will you cry about then.

[Vadrigar.]

legit wins don't break Hopkins record, legit title defences do

the WBA interim title ?

that fake " title " only exists because of greed/corruption

The WBA have promised to phase out those fake titles in favor of having one champion..... so, IF Golovkin beats Jacobs - and he likely will - the WBA interim title will cease to exist.....

..... meaning that when Golovkin " breaks " Hopkins record..... he will have done so by defending a title that no longer exists..... which is yea, fkn lame

the WBA promised to phase out those fake titles for a reason, so why support that rubbish by recognizing them now?

diminishing the standards within boxing is disrespectful both to the sport and to the fighters, past and present

So technically Golovkin will have zero title defences if he beats Jacobs LMFAO.

[A.K]

So technically Golovkin will have zero title defences if he beats Jacobs LMFAO.

You reaching harder than Anthony Davis for a rebound dawg

[aboutfkntime]

the interim belt isn't counted as one of his title defenses you need to get your facts straight son. And don't start on the level of opposition look at some of the bums Hopkins feasted on.

" interim "..... " regular "... same thing

he wasn't the REAL champ

how is it possible for the WBA to have 3 " champions " ?

how is it possible for 3 WBA " champions " to rack up title "defences" simultaneously?

[aboutfkntime]

the same people arguing that GGG's title wasn't around during Bernard's reign.

well Bernard defended his IBF title which was only around since 1983 lmao. so Monzon, Robinson, Hagler..... none of them saw the IBF title.

So Hopkins record don't count?

I mean at least be consistent with your narrative. just LMAO

nope

people arguing the WBA cannot have 3 " champions " simultaneously

how is it possible for 3 WBA " champions " to make legitimate defences simultaneously?

if your wife had kids to 2 other guys, would you consider them yours?

would you consider them legitimate?

[GMAN SUPREME]

" interim "..... " regular "... same thing

he wasn't the REAL champ

how is it possible for the WBA to have 3 " champions " ?

how is it possible for 3 WBA " champions " to rack up title "defences" simultaneously?

chris your only b1tching because its ggg.