Comments Thread For: Hopkins: Jacobs Will Beat Golovkin - A Big Upset is Coming!
Collapse
-
Comment
-
legit wins don't break Hopkins record, legit title defences do
the WBA interim title ?
that fake " title " only exists because of greed/corruption
The WBA have promised to phase out those fake titles in favor of having one champion..... so, IF Golovkin beats Jacobs - and he likely will - the WBA interim title will cease to exist.....
..... meaning that when Golovkin " breaks " Hopkins record..... he will have done so by defending a title that no longer exists..... which is yea, fkn lame
the WBA promised to phase out those fake titles for a reason, so why support that rubbish by recognizing them now?
diminishing the standards within boxing is disrespectful both to the sport and to the fighters, past and presentComment
-
without his size ward wouldn't be able to use his clinching tactics. golovkin beats him if they were the same size. at 168 I like his chances it wont be an easy fight for ward. this is all hypothetical though it will never happen ward is now at light heavyweight and he has kovalev problems lolComment
-
legit wins don't break Hopkins record, legit title defences do
the WBA interim title ?
that fake " title " only exists because of greed/corruption
The WBA have promised to phase out those fake titles in favor of having one champion..... so, IF Golovkin beats Jacobs - and he likely will - the WBA interim title will cease to exist.....
..... meaning that when Golovkin " breaks " Hopkins record..... he will have done so by defending a title that no longer exists..... which is yea, fkn lame
the WBA promised to phase out those fake titles for a reason, so why support that rubbish by recognizing them now?
diminishing the standards within boxing is disrespectful both to the sport and to the fighters, past and presentComment
-
legit wins don't break Hopkins record, legit title defences do
the WBA interim title ?
that fake " title " only exists because of greed/corruption
The WBA have promised to phase out those fake titles in favor of having one champion..... so, IF Golovkin beats Jacobs - and he likely will - the WBA interim title will cease to exist.....
..... meaning that when Golovkin " breaks " Hopkins record..... he will have done so by defending a title that no longer exists..... which is yea, fkn lame
the WBA promised to phase out those fake titles for a reason, so why support that rubbish by recognizing them now?
diminishing the standards within boxing is disrespectful both to the sport and to the fighters, past and presentComment
-
" interim "..... " regular "... same thing
he wasn't the REAL champ
how is it possible for the WBA to have 3 " champions " ?
how is it possible for 3 WBA " champions " to rack up title "defences" simultaneously?Comment
-
the same people arguing that GGG's title wasn't around during Bernard's reign.
well Bernard defended his IBF title which was only around since 1983 lmao. so Monzon, Robinson, Hagler..... none of them saw the IBF title.
So Hopkins record don't count?
I mean at least be consistent with your narrative. just LMAO
nope
people arguing the WBA cannot have 3 " champions " simultaneously
how is it possible for 3 WBA " champions " to make legitimate defences simultaneously?
if your wife had kids to 2 other guys, would you consider them yours?
would you consider them legitimate?Comment
-
Comment
Comment