Comments Thread For: Gennady Golovkin vs. Daniel Jacobs: There is NO Rematch Clause

[angkag]

If Golovkin loses, I doubt we see him again. Without any belts on offer, who's going to be willing to get in the ring with him ?

[ThatDude44]

don't waste your hard earned money man...

We shall see.

[Patsfan bri]

As long as Danny doesn't get caught early, he is a very live dog here. He is younger , faster and hits just as hard. He just doesn't have the best chin.

[bluemax]

Lets be honest Jacobs record isn't exactly peppered with the names of A list fighters. Sergio Mora?? ZZZZzzzzzz.
He's also been knocked out cold back in 2010. I give him a punchers chance early since he's really a super middleweight looking to take advantage of smaller guys by draining himself to make weight. He was almost 8 pounds over a week out. My money will be on GGG to add another victim to his record.

[Buratina]

No rematch clause means GGG team does not even consider any result other than a win over Jacobs. And why would anyone?

[Jrtxboiy]

Ggg record not so hot either

[Thaman2x]

Styles make fights, and every fighter has a puncher's chance of getting the Win. Should be a good fight. Judging by both of their last TWO fights, I'm rolling with a 12UD for either one in this one.

[Jubei]

GGG will not need a rematch clause in any of his fights, he is just superior to the boxers nowadays. Most of them are inactive greedy protected anti fighters. Not hungry enough, not skilled enough, GGG has the dog in him, he cant be beaten by todays fighters.

[Shadoww702]

The payout is 575$, so about 6-1.

I thought GGG would of been a lil higher??? Looks like the experts thunk the fight is going to be closer?? Worst odds I've ever seen Canelo as the favorite

[alexguiness]

Jacobs is not a "live dog" , he is like an 11/2 underdog...