Comments Thread For: Gennady Golovkin vs. Daniel Jacobs: There is NO Rematch Clause

[MDPopescu]

In which way the "rematch clause" helped Kovalev? On the contrary -- he thought: "I'll beat him to the punch, I have the rematch clause anyway"... Now look!

[Chollo Vista]

Won't need a rematch, Jacobs & Chollo going to sleep.

Your bum ass is outta here.... We're gonna have to call you Westcoast

[Chollo Vista]

He'll come in here talking about how the fix is in because GGG is the house fighter thus why he is so confident to not need a rematch clause.

I mean, he's already coming up with excuses. Bias commentary and such.

Just can't stop talking about me, huh? Kid, I've utterly destroyed you... Just let it go

[Chollo Vista]

Putting $100 on Jacobs on Bovada.

Smart bet.........

[woo9115]

GGG will patiently walk Jacobs down. He will be cautious but he will not be passive. GGG will test Jacob's punch. He needs rounds and a workout. He's been out of the ring and needs a good workout. Jacobs is a good fighter. It can't be a one and done. KO in the 8th... GGG will be leading in new all cards. Jacobs won't be able to take the GGG punch. Jacobs got tapped by Priog and Mora....

BJS is next. Canelo will continue to avoid...

[vitali1999]

No need for one. Jacob's loses

[fernandtg]

Putting $100 on Jacobs on Bovada.

don't waste your hard earned money man...

[goldglove]

With an amateur boxing background like Danny has he is a far cry from being a bum. Surely. He has skills no doubt.

[Citizen Koba]

The payout is 575$, so about 6-1.

It's almost tempting at those odds even though I'm fairly confident Golovkin wins. Jacobs is certainly in with a decent shot.

[Elroy The Great]

some wins dont need redo's. as epic as hagler hearns was, no redo would have been necessary.