Comments Thread For: Jermall Charlo Lands WBC #2 Rank at 160 To Champion Golovkin

[Sledgeweather17]

Nice attempt at erasing any credit Jacobs deserves for his great win over Quillin.We get it, first round knockouts dont count now. That's just luck. Just remember Charlo didnt loom so great against Trout who you probably think is a bum. His best win was over Williams who's not got a single good name on his record,whos chin is so bad he's knocked silly by a jab. Try as you might, these are the things you will have to write once Golovkin signs for Charlo. Everyone is a bum, makes me wonder why you don't find another sport instead of the sport of bums.

Charlo didn't look great against Trout? How did GGG look against his recent welterweight opponent?

Jrock was a promising and avoided prospect who didn't have a loss on his record, Lemule had already been KO'd by two bums when he fought GGG. Nuff said!

[Madison Boxing]

ggg steamrolls this guy but we know what will get said if he takes the fight 'ggg picking on smaller guys doe!!!!'

[JakeTheBoxer]

Charlo should fight one middleweight first.

[daggum]

WBA regular champ aint no champ. Wtf! You calling Jacobs a champ? Then why isn't this a unification bout? Exactly!

It aint even about bias, I'm an Andrade fan and if you check my recent post history you'll see that I said the same about him bragging about the Culcay victory as if he's a legit world champion when Lara is the real WBA champion. Same with Jacobs. He aint no world champion.

Dude Vargas had a world title when Manny beat him, but you don't see no one hyping up Vargas as if he's some destroyer like you GGG nuthuggers tryna tell us that Lemule is world class.

If Lemule is world class and a great victory for GGG then what is Andre Berto seeing as he's a two time world champ and also has a loss to a bum (Soto Karass)? Was that a great victory for Mayweather or does this failure of a logic only apply to GGG?

floyd fought berto after he had 3 losses in quick succession and hadnt been champ in 4 years. ggg fought lemiuex when he was champ so its a little different dont you think?

[bluepete]

Charlo didn't look great against Trout? How did GGG look against his recent welterweight opponent?

Jrock was a promising and avoided prospect who didn't have a loss on his record, Lemule had already been KO'd by two bums when he fought GGG. Nuff said!

Brook had a good couple of rounds against Golovkin, but he didn't push him to a majority verdict like Starling did Michael Nunn. But Nunn is obviously a bum for having a competitive fight against a good welterweight. Meanwhile you write off Jacobs knocking out Quillin with a flick of your wrist because it doesn't suit your narrative but hype Charlos win against avoided good prospect JRock who hadn't fought anyone world class and gets knocked by jabs. Interesting double standards. Ones you will have to revisit if Golovkin knocks out Charlo. So I did it for you already. No, Charlo didn't look great against Trout. Yes, his big win was against a guy with no one on his record who has a shaky chin. So no credit for Golovkin needed. And if he knocks them both out in a round, well, as we know, first round knockouts mean nothing anymore.

[Sledgeweather17]

Brook had a good couple of rounds against Golovkin, but he didn't push him to a majority verdict like Starling did Michael Nunn. But Nunn is obviously a bum for having a competitive fight against a good welterweight. Meanwhile you write off Jacobs knocking out Quillin with a flick of your wrist because it doesn't suit your narrative but hype Charlos win against avoided good prospect JRock who hadn't fought anyone world class and gets knocked by jabs. Interesting double standards. Ones you will have to revisit if Golovkin knocks out Charlo. So I did it for you already. No, Charlo didn't look great against Trout. Yes, his big win was against a guy with no one on his record who has a shaky chin. So no credit for Golovkin needed. And if he knocks them both out in a round, well, as we know, first round knockouts mean nothing anymore.

Dude this is getting pointless seriously fast. Golovkin's best win is Lemule, who has a weaker resume than Andre Berto. His other best win is a freaking Welterweight. Nuff said. You're embarassing yourself now.

[daggum]

Dude this is getting pointless seriously fast. Golovkin's best win is Lemule, who has a weaker resume than Andre Berto. His other best win is a freaking Welterweight. Nuff said. You're embarassing yourself now.

ggg has a lot of good wins but no great wins we already know this. he kinda reminds me of floyd. if he had some old faded fighters to beat you would probably think hes great lmao. and if you are going by resume geale has a much better resume than berto. he beat sturm, sylvester, and mundine and only lost 2 fights by controversial SD's before fighting ggg. murray should have been lineal champ when ggg destroyed him but you will be a boxrec warrior and pretend thats not true.

[bluepete]

Dude this is getting pointless seriously fast. Golovkin's best win is Lemule, who has a weaker resume than Andre Berto. His other best win is a freaking Welterweight. Nuff said. You're embarassing yourself now.

But he's best win will soon be Jacobs. Who's best win is a one round win over Quillin. Which somehow doesn't count. Charlo beating a guy with a weak chin who had fought no one, this makes him better than Jacobs on your mind. I like the way you think. Haha.

[JakeTheBoxer]

Charlo is 154 fighter so far, with 0 wins in 160 division.

[ShoulderRoll]

Charlo should fight one middleweight first.

Give him Jorge Sebastian Heiland. Winner gets Lil G.