Easy. Marquez is the better fighter. He never took a knee like Kneeguel Cotto. He destroyed Pacquiao, something Cotto can only dream about. He took his loses like a real man, unlike Diva Cotto who ran off the ring all emotional claiming victories when everyone else didn't.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who's greater Miguel Cotto or Juan Manuel Marquez and why?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Street View PostEasy. Marquez is the better fighter. He never took a knee like Kneeguel Cotto. He destroyed Pacquiao, something Cotto can only dream about. He took his loses like a real man, unlike Diva Cotto who ran off the ring all emotional claiming victories when everyone else didn't.
Comment
-
I'm biased, since 140 lb. Cotton my favorite fighter ever, besides Tyson, but if you say JMM, not mad at all. Both equal, IMO.
Margarito's hand wraps really detailed his career, so you can't truly say Cotto got a fair shake as far as his career goes. He could've been so so much better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ramses07 View PostI've always felt bad for JMM, he never got the big fights in his physical prime,
and he got the short stick on some decisions
Comment
-
Personally, Cotto has the superior career but JMM has THAT win.
Cotto for me, on top of being the better boxer too.
Comment
-
Comment