Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IV rehydration ban - how do you feel about it, and how do they enforce it?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    IV bans make sense in MMA because the weight classes are 15 lbs apart. But in boxing they're like 5-6 pounds apart. What's the ****ing point?

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
      It says it's preferred not that it works better.
      Te****utically recommended you fool. They say oral IS better.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
        No, there are instances where one needed an I.V but if this has anything to do with Floyd, Floyd did it 14 times over the legal limit (750ML to the 50 ML).
        That's not true

        You KNOW it's not true

        Yet

        You keep right on typing it.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
          It says it's preferred not that it works better.
          Here's the full quote from the original WADA paper.
          There is a well-established body of scientific opinion to confirm that oral rehydration is the preferred the****utic choice, deemed by some authorities as being even more effective than the parenteral option.
          https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...ons_3.0_EN.pdf
          Last edited by DoktorSleepless; 03-04-2017, 12:53 AM.

          Comment


          • #15
            I think it's BS. All the trouble started when they changed from same day weigh ins about 8 hours before the fight to weighing in about 32 hours before the fight. With the same day weigh in a boxer could only gain a few pounds. When they have a day and a half to gain weight they can pack on 15 pounds or more and often do. Just return to same day weigh ins and the problem is solved. They should never have changed from same day weigh ins o begin with. Why try fix to something that works just fine?

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
              Te****utically recommended you fool. They say oral IS better.
              How does the****utic recommended mean better you ******?

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by DoktorSleepless View Post
                Here's the full quote from the original WADA paper.


                https://www.wada-ama.org/sites/defau...ons_3.0_EN.pdf
                Some authorities say it's better, so what do the others say? It's not a fact that it's better.

                Comment


                • #18
                  if i were a professional boxer, id love for my opponent to do whatever it took for him to be in his best condition. drink up, roid up....whatever. if im really as good as i think i am, i still win.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by SemiGreat View Post
                    if i were a professional boxer, id love for my opponent to do whatever it took for him to be in his best condition. drink up, roid up....whatever. if im really as good as i think i am, i still win.
                    Lmao What? This is one of the dumbest things I've read on here.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by THEFRESHBRAWLER View Post
                      Lmao What? This is one of the dumbest things I've read on here.
                      show me a fight where the roider (or the like) did the impossible.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP