Comments Thread For: Danny Garcia-Keith Thurman - No Rematch Clause in Contracts

[HanzGruber]

Has Garcia even had a rematch clause in any of his fights?

He never rematched Khan, Herrera or even Peterson. Two of which were controversial.

This is looking fishy now.

Fishy? Cmon bro. He rematches morales cause rematch clause. This fight doesn't need one. Who would it be for?

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Fishy? Cmon bro. He rematches morales cause rematch clause. This fight doesn't need one. Who would it be for?

Oh yea forgot about Morales. But that's only cause the dude was coming out his nursing home in Guadalajara.

Why not have one? There are two belts on the line, one from each side. Or am I missing something here? Frampton - Santa Cruz had one and it was a lesser fight. Why not this one?

[dookie]

A draw then both keep their belts and move on with their 0!

[boxingitis]

Please be a KO.

[taste]

"...I don’t think Danny wins without a stoppage. I believe if it goes to the scorecards, it’s gonna favor Keith Thurman..."

Thurman's saying exactly what I'm thinking!

[Kigali]

Good we moving on to Pacquiao anyway.

Like Manny....he'll have a brutal KO loss on his record.

[bigjavi973]

Good we moving on to Pacquiao anyway.

I think floyd should fight the winner