Comments Thread For: Danny Garcia-Keith Thurman - No Rematch Clause in Contracts

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

NEW YORK If Danny Garcia-Keith Thurman is a highly competitive fight that leaves doubt about who deserved to win, there's no guarantee that they'll fight again. Garcia confirmed Thursday that there isn't a rematch clause in the contracts for their 12-round welterweight championship unification fight Saturday night at Barclays Center in Brooklyn (CBS; 9 p.m. ET/6 p.m. PT).
[Click Here To Read More]

[1hourRun]

Good we moving on to Pacquiao anyway.

[JASON SHAW]

Good we moving on to Pacquiao anyway.

POOCHQUIAO THE CHERRYPICKER IS BUSY FIGHTING DANNYS LEFTOVER..... HE IS ON A PERMANENT DIET OF VARGAS AND JEFF HORN THESE DAYS

[OctoberRed]

That means controversial decision. Thurman better go for the KO

[Sadiqkingofko]

That means controversial decision. Thurman better go for the KO

That was my first thought as well

[REMOVE SHARK 55]

Good you don't want to deal with the pathetic unsportsmanlike Kovalev & his ilk.

[THEFRESHBRAWLER]

Finally something for the PBC haters to complain about. Add it to the list along with ring entrances and fighters purses.

[Motorcity Cobra]

Good. Both men have belts, there shouldn't be a rematch clause. Winner moves onto the Brook/Spence winner.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Has Garcia even had a rematch clause in any of his fights?

He never rematched Khan, Herrera or even Peterson. Two of which were controversial.

This is looking fishy now.

[FLY TY]

Good. Both men have belts, there shouldn't be a rematch clause. Winner moves onto the Brook/Spence winner.

I see them drawing that out until next year, for some reason.