Comments Thread For: Klitschko Banking on Experience To Push Him Past Joshua

[KidDinamita]

If Joshua loses at least he fought one of the best of his era, unlike bumsquad Wilder, who fights bums. Worst champion ever

[Jewish-Reptile]

How much will you cry if Joshua Ko's Wlad in the first 30 seconds? or will you go straight to the obvious response of 'Wlad was too old, prime Wlad would've beaten him easy'

That will be a perfect response thanks. Klitschko looked like shyt last out and has been out the ring 18 months, Hearn and Joshua wouldn't be taking this fight otherwise unless they feel like the train is about to come to an end anyway so they're cashing out whilst they can.

Hearn is a clever boy.

[Liondw]

If I judge on the fight Klitschko had with Fury, I'd have to go with Joshua on this one, but we will see. Joshua does seem more talented and maybe in his last fight looked a bit less robotic, even though Molina was not real opposition.

[Poppo168]

That will be a perfect response thanks. Klitschko looked like shyt last out and has been out the ring 18 months, Hearn and Joshua wouldn't be taking this fight otherwise unless they feel like the train is about to come to an end anyway so they're cashing out whilst they can.

Hearn is a clever boy.

So going on what you're saying it's a lose lose situation for Joshua, if he wins it's because 'wlad was shot' and if he loses then he loses. You've got to give him some credit no matter what Wlad he faces. Given everything I've said, I wouldn't want to put a large bet on either because it's got the possibility to go either way, though I'd pick Joshua if I had to.

[mlac]

so wlad's suddenly going to not be terrified to throw punches against a roided up hulk with all KO's ?



don't let the fluffy fury fan's fool you, wlad was shot 2 year's ago, he's shot + 2 years inactivity now.

[Jewish-Reptile]

So going on what you're saying it's a lose lose situation for Joshua, if he wins it's because 'wlad was shot' and if he loses then he loses. You've got to give him some credit no matter what Wlad he faces. Given everything I've said, I wouldn't want to put a large bet on either because it's got the possibility to go either way, though I'd pick Joshua if I had to.

How can I give credit to Joshua when I refuse to credit Fists of Fluff Furry for allowing Wlad to get old as opposed to taking the fight earlier, same applies with Wilder dude could have had the Wlad fight before Fluff fought him but Wikder went on record stating why'd a need to fight him I can let him get old first.

[Poppo168]

How can I give credit to Joshua when I refuse to credit Fists of Fluff Furry for allowing Wlad to get old as opposed to taking the fight earlier, same applies with Wilder dude could have had the Wlad fight before Fluff fought him but Wikder went on record stating why'd a need to fight him I can let him get old first.

I get what you're saying but Joshua took the fight, he couldn't really take the fight much earlier than he did & although Wlad isn't the same fighter he once was, you've continuously said Wlad beats Joshua, so he's got to still have something left for you to say that, either that or you dislike Joshua that much that you'd pick anybody to beat him.

I think Joshua could be great but his chin worries me, we'll see what happens though when the fight happens, I've got my ticket, just hope the under card is actually good this time.