I know many don't like broner but that was no robbery

[IronDanHamza]

It can if the promoters fighter always gets the
benefit of the doubt....

You do realize your disgusting attitude basicaly condones
gift decisions you sh*heel...

You assume that every robbery is due to corruption.

It isn't.

[JJRod]

Its not a surprise last night to see a bunch of sour g****s

Many wanted to see Broner lose but he did enough to beat Granados

He landed the better shots, showed decent defense and closed the fight stronger

Granados did well, deserves a rematch but to call it a robbery is a joke.

If you thought Granados was busier and won, cool but to say robbery is an exaggerating

Of course it was no robbery. It was a close fight with close rounds and Broner got the nod.

[IronDanHamza]

It does most times though doesn't it you jack*ss??




Now your just talking in circles...

Why have you ignored what i said about conflict of intrest??
Is it because it destroys your argument and debunks everything you said??


Name 10 underdogs who in high profile fights actually won a
decision on a rival promoters card against a name???
Lets stick to the last 2 years....

I'm literally talking directly as possible and no it's not necessarily most of the time.

Sometimes it does sometimes it doesn't. I'm not dis*****g that there is corruption in boxing but a robbery isnt always due to corruption.

You don't seem to understand what a robbery is.

That's a very specific question and a strange one but off the top of my head Badou Jack just had decisions not go his way on a TMT card when he was the favourite. Pre determined decisions? Somehow I doubt it.

In essence you're claiming that the vast majority of fights have pre determined winners.

[therealpugilist]

Of course it was no robbery. It was a close fight with close rounds and Broner got the nod.

to anyone with common sense and 0 biase.....you should've seen all the "Granados got robbed posts.....every close fight seems to be a robbery when the guy they want to lose gets the nod