GGG was willing to move down for a challenge to fight floyd at 154, where floyd held the belt, why didn't floyd take that challenge, yet you hammer him about moving up for challenges that are far less lucrative, is that a double standard in your eyes or not cobra?
Comments Thread For: 30-Day Weights: Gennady Golovkin 165.1, Daniel Jacobs 174.8
Collapse
-
Comments Thread For: 30-Day Weights: Gennady Golovkin 165.1, Daniel Jacobs 174.8
On Saturday, WBC, IBF, WBA, IBO middleweight champion Gennady "GGG" Golovkin (36-0, 33 KOs) and mandatory challenger Daniel "The Miracle Man" Jacobs (32-1, 29 KO's) took part in the WBC's mandatory 30-day weight check.
[Click Here To Read More]Comment
-
He once said he'd fight anybody from 105 to 200+.
And I believed him....
.... OK, I didn't believe him, but I'll keep saying that I did because I want to pretend I have some sort of credibility and integrity when I moan, like I little b*tch, about Golovkin not moving up.Comment
-
fighting 168 champs probably make as much money as fighting BJS so why bother, he's still w8ing canelo anywayComment
-
-
-
What did GGG do at 154 to deserve a shot at the belt? What did he do to earn a shot at Floyd? Canelo, and Cotto earned their shots. Floyd earned his shot at OscarComment
-
He do got small legs. Can't believe Im asking your opinion on anything, but what's your opinion on that? Clearly with GGG it's allowing him to pack more muscle/energy on his upper half and have a ton of power, so it would seem to be the ideal boxer's body. But then again, Pacquiao had huge calfs that seemed to give him his power and foot speed/explosiveness. So does that mean it's actually better to have bigger legs? I'd be interested in knowledgeable opinions on this.Comment
-
This is about staying in shape between fights.
He's a big middleweight that doesn't get fat between fights. Froch was big at 168, but never walked around heavier than 175.Comment
Comment