I don't feel bad for frampton though after the way he did rigo
Comments Thread For: Leo Santa Cruz: My Father Said No Belfast, Says I'll Get Robbed
Collapse
-
Based on what ?leos father is 100% right.
the judges favoured frampton, perhaps because of the crowd influence, in both their previous fights. i had the first fight 7-5 frampton and the 2nd fight i had it 8-3 leo going into the 12th so either 8-4 or 9-3 leo
if leo beat frampton in belfast, he would get robbed.
all the other 0 robberies on Belfast?
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
I got bored for watching both fights because all they threw were naught but arm punches that wouldn't knock a glass off table. Wasn't credible. Leo fighting a short guy's style without using his reach, he was just spinning his shoulders in an ugly way.Am I the only one who didn't really enjoy that rematch?
It never caught fire. I actually didn't even bother scoring the rounds to be fair but your scorecard seems a fairly common consensus. In which case I guess we'd could all do without it because as margin of victory that is comfortable.
I just remember Frampton loading up a lot and throwing single shots. Frampton couldn't knock LSC out with a cricket bat.
Frampton esp in the 2nd fight was trying to use his 'reach', i hated and had been fed up everytime his up-jab fell short 10 inches to LEo's face. it looked really ******, his short baby arm just couldn't reach his face again and again.Comment
-
As many have said, total b*tch move but Frampton is also an idiot for not making LS2 travel for the second fight. But I do respect it though.Comment
-
Hearn gets a lot of **** but he's smart. Frampton's team are not smart.
Hearn would've got the Selby/Frampton fight done for big money then tell LSC to come to Belfast or no rematch.
Clueless team that his backing Frampton, they got tricked and it was so simple.Comment
Comment