I don't feel bad for frampton though after the way he did rigo
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Leo Santa Cruz: My Father Said No Belfast, Says I'll Get Robbed
Collapse
-
Originally posted by jas View Postleos father is 100% right.
the judges favoured frampton, perhaps because of the crowd influence, in both their previous fights. i had the first fight 7-5 frampton and the 2nd fight i had it 8-3 leo going into the 12th so either 8-4 or 9-3 leo
if leo beat frampton in belfast, he would get robbed.
all the other 0 robberies on Belfast?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mlac View PostBased on what ?
all the other 0 robberies on Belfast?
He mustn't like money. I suppose he is just trying to have his cake and eat it but it just looks so bad.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sparked_26 View PostAm I the only one who didn't really enjoy that rematch?
It never caught fire. I actually didn't even bother scoring the rounds to be fair but your scorecard seems a fairly common consensus. In which case I guess we'd could all do without it because as margin of victory that is comfortable.
I just remember Frampton loading up a lot and throwing single shots. Frampton couldn't knock LSC out with a cricket bat.
Frampton esp in the 2nd fight was trying to use his 'reach', i hated and had been fed up everytime his up-jab fell short 10 inches to LEo's face. it looked really ******, his short baby arm just couldn't reach his face again and again.
Comment
-
As many have said, total b*tch move but Frampton is also an idiot for not making LS2 travel for the second fight. But I do respect it though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by .:: JSFD26 ::. View PostAs many have said, total b*tch move but Frampton is also an idiot for not making LS2 travel for the second fight. But I do respect it though.
Hearn would've got the Selby/Frampton fight done for big money then tell LSC to come to Belfast or no rematch.
Clueless team that his backing Frampton, they got tricked and it was so simple.
Comment
Comment