Wilder = Michael Grant. AJ = Frank Bruno

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boliodogs
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • May 2008
    • 33358
    • 824
    • 1,782
    • 309,589

    #31
    I think Wilder is better than Grant and AJ is better than Bruno. Wilder needs to improve the quality of opponents he defends his title against but his latest opponent is better than usual. AJ is fighting Wlad who is a top 3 world ranked heavyweight.What more can he do. I don't think they are frauds.

    Comment

    • Elroy The Great
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Aug 2016
      • 15935
      • 371
      • 249
      • 45,972

      #32


      nice comparison. i think theres more talent in wilder though.

      Comment

      • The D3vil
        WBA/WBC/WBO/IBF/Lineal
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Mar 2016
        • 6083
        • 1,523
        • 1,347
        • 56,286

        #33
        Originally posted by juggernaut666
        Holmes has less title defenses and not any where near the impact that Wlad has on boxing history in the actual ring. holmes has nothing on wlad actually other than drop kicking Berbick over a car. he does come close though with the glass off water poured over Briggs head!
        Dude, Wlad fought weak competition in the weakest era of heavyweight boxing.

        Dude lost to Ross Purity, Lamon Brewster and Corie Sanders.

        Larry Holmes had one of the greatest jabs in the history of boxing and was in wars, legitimate wars with Ken Norton, Earnie Shavers, & Trevor Berbick.

        All better than anybody Vlad beat.

        You're mistaking the inflated win/loss records of modern champs who barely fight and fight bums with guys like Holmes who came up in the '70s, which was the best era of heavyweights.

        Comment

        • mlac
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2014
          • 20293
          • 1,620
          • 1,473
          • 210,093

          #34
          i was a little off with this, Frank Bruno might of beaten AJ

          Comment

          • mlac
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2014
            • 20293
            • 1,620
            • 1,473
            • 210,093

            #35
            Originally posted by boliodogs
            I think Wilder is better than Grant and AJ is better than Bruno. Wilder needs to improve the quality of opponents he defends his title against but his latest opponent is better than usual. AJ is fighting Wlad who is a top 3 world ranked heavyweight.What more can he do. I don't think they are frauds.
            What do you think now?

            i think both Bruno V Joshua & Wilder V Grant would be 50/50 matchups.

            Comment

            • TMLT87
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jan 2020
              • 6185
              • 1,806
              • 894
              • 27,292

              #36
              Grant/Wilder I cant decide on but I think Joshua is a step above Bruno. Comparable power, comparably bad reaction to punches, but Joshua is more athletic, more mobile, better fight IQ, better cardio, more versatile, taller/rangier and less sluggish. Not to mention his top 5 wins in only 24 fights are better than what Bruno put together in 45.

              Comment

              • Marchegiano
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Aug 2010
                • 12209
                • 1,790
                • 2,307
                • 165,288

                #37
                Originally posted by RomanReigns
                If Joshua beats Klitcshko. He already have a better resume than Tyson and Bruno.
                Wlad has no resume himself

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP