Who has a better resume, Mikey Garcia or Lomachenko?

[gauze]

I wouldn't say Garcia looked better against Martinez

Man, Garcia knocked him the **** out

you must be confusing the fights. lomachenko ktfo'd martinez in 5 rounds. garcia stopped him in the 8th with a body shot after getting decked in the 2nd round.

[Loque-san]

There is not much to separate them.

Mikey has a deeper resume. Loma has the best win(s).

[hhs661]

Mikey Garcia

[A.K]

Man, Garcia knocked him the **** out

And so did loma in better fashion, Garcia does not have a win against oppnents Like Russell jr and the ax man, no ones even close to the talent level of those two on his resume and loma did it in 8 fights .

You guys strait refuse to give Russians any credit lol

[asgarth]

I mean, one of the best wins in Lomachenko's resume was a competitive close MD win over some prospect and Garcia looked better against Salido and Martinez.

At the end of the day, scorecards is the only thing that matters, that's just my opinion, you don't have to agree with it

But on the other hand he got fights with Piriapinyo-Gamalier Rodriguez-Koasicha and planning to fight Sosa now, wasting years of his prime condition on some bums, that makes me really disappointed so I'm not sure about average quality of his opposition

Lol what? Scorecards are not the only thing that matters. Maybe for casuals who boxrec their knowledge.
According to your logic Mayweather had a razor close fight against Canelo Alvarez, although everyone knows he dominated alvarez with ease.
Pernell Whitaker didnt school Chavez? Bradley beat Pacquiao first time around? I hope you are not serious.

Sosa was clearly beaten by Walters, but didnt embarass himself. Afterwards he won against unbeaten Fortuna and Stephen Smith.
He is by no means a great opponent, but he is no pushover. Also Lomachenko just won against Walters, who was highly ranked by most guys here. I dont like it, but only a hand few of boxers are fighting back to back against great fighters.

Back to the question, as of right now Garcia has the deeper resume.

[Boks 123]

Tough one but I'm leaning towards Mikey G.

[boliodogs]

I love them both. They are both great fighters. Mikey has no losses and Loma has one loss. I think Loma has defeated better fighters than Garcia has. Not that Garcia couldn't beat the same guys Loma beat but he hasn't fought guys that high rated yet. For instance Loma just won every minute of every round with Walters. Garcia has yet to beat a fighter as highly regarded as Walters was. I am sure he will do so in the future.

[Motorcity Cobra]

How does losing to a guy Mikey beat & beating a guy past prime that Mikey beat in his prime make for a better or even close resume?

[g27region]

There is not much to separate them.

Mikey has a deeper resume. Loma has the best win(s).

That is probably true. Garcia has a better resume but best Lomachenko's wins > best Garcia's wins

How does losing to a guy Mikey beat & beating a guy past prime that Mikey beat in his prime make for a better or even close resume?

Yes. I love Lomachenko as an amateur and he's ATG in amateur boxing, he's on my p4p list based on his amateur accomplishments. But he didn't have to turn pro, that was a wrong thing to do for him and he can't attract any fans, from business point of view even Broner > Lomachenko (not his fault he's foreign though)

Lol what? Scorecards are not the only thing that matters. Maybe for casuals who boxrec their knowledge.
According to your logic Mayweather had a razor close fight against Canelo Alvarez, although everyone knows he dominated alvarez with ease.

Mayweather situation was different

[A.K]

And so did loma in better fashion, Garcia does not have a win against oppnents Like Russell jr and the ax man, no ones even close to the talent level of those two on his resume and loma did it in 8 fights .

You guys strait refuse to give Russians any credit lol

.......take your Ls