Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Wilder vs. Povetkin Legal Battle Will Head To a Jury Trial

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
    You spelled his name wrong so I fixed it for u.
    That's because it's all you have to add to a constructive boxing debate. We're done here aren't we ?

    Comment


    • #32
      Why would they?
      It appears Wilder's camp is suing because Povetkin's positive test resulted in their fight being cancelled and him missing a payday. Povetkin just got popped for another dirty test, why would anyone give him the benefit of the doubt now?

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by firstborn View Post
        It appears Wilder's camp is suing because Povetkin's positive test resulted in their fight being cancelled and him missing a payday. Povetkin just got popped for another dirty test, why would anyone give him the benefit of the doubt now?
        That's probably going to be the number 1 arguing point. While PEDvetkin team will not want the jury to hear that and Wilder team will want the jury to hear that to show a pattern of him cheating...

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Scott. Weiland View Post
          At what point am I supporting him ?quote it please.

          Another dummy who can't read, back to kindergarten with these other two dumb asses.
          How come you didn't answer my question??? How do you have ZERO traces the first 3 tests and the 4th you all of sudden do???

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
            How come you didn't answer my question??? How do you have ZERO traces the first 3 tests and the 4th you all of sudden do???
            Who am I, a testing authority ? Email them let them know you're thoroughly disappointed with their testing regimen for not busting Pedvetkin every test ? Did I spell it right that time, I hope so we can spend more time debating boxing as opposed to my typos, oh wait damn I spelt his name right the first time, don't damn me !

            At this point I think I don't really care, the testing bodies appear somewhat stringent and somewhat not so much enough. I don't have an issue with the testing body which in fact caught Povetkin I do however have an issue with the regulating body that oversaw the Fury tests, theirs a discussion I'd like to participate in, one in which actually allows a failed doper to compete for world titles and fails to notify the relevant parties until afterwards including the former champion who lost his belts to said doper.

            Comment


            • #36
              Wait, people still believe Povetkin wasn't doped up to the eyeballs for the Wilder fight?

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Scott. Weiland View Post
                And here we have another who don't know what he's takin about.

                Congratulations you just made the ****** of the Year short list, not that we didnt know you weren't worthy already with over 9k posts in less than two years already ! Poll and thread coming, I still haven't compiled a full ten yet, I feel Laced Up deserves some serious competition this year having competed against only himself last year, don't worry LoadedWraps you'll get your chance to unify the titles.

                C'mon add something to amuse us even more, I'm begging you.
                Originally posted by BrometheusBob. View Post


                Sad to see an otherwise reasonable poster go to this length to deny what has happened
                Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
                That's what happens when they go FULL RTARD!
                Originally posted by Szef View Post
                [IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/s7qr6din3yfHq/*****.gif[/IMG]

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by LoadedWraps View Post
                  Bunch of dummies on this site, I dropped and stopped them all. I don't do TKO's just vicious cold blooded knock outs.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Scott. Weiland View Post
                    Bunch of dummies on this site, I dropped and stopped them all. I don't do TKO's just vicious cold blooded knock outs.
                    And the test results came back POSITIVE for traces of PED's. They said you passed three tests and on the 4th one you came up positive.... But only traces doe.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
                      And the test results came back POSITIVE for traces of PED's. They said you passed three tests and on the 4th one you came up positive.... But only traces doe.
                      Yes and you're allowed trace amounts between January and October after the ban becomes effective, no trace amounts thereafter, we've established. What we have not established is if you can read or not, and presuming you can this sill is not making any sense to you is it ?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP