Originally posted by justblaze813;17 hi401478
Comments Thread For: Roach Furious: Cotto Blocked 90% of The Shots, Canelo Owes Us!
Collapse
-
I don't even think Roach is that crazy because most of the rounds were close. I just think Canelo had more mustard on his punches, and Cotto was only landing jabs and right hands. His right hand is weak. It snapped Canelo's head back, but it wasn't the same as when Canelo landed. Canelo had the flashier punches so he took all the close rounds. I had it 116-112 Canelo. If they were equal size I could see Cotto winning.Comment
-
-
that is one issue, and he got a 114-114 from one of the judges in the mayweather fight where i dont think he won a single round, much less 6.The problem isn't Canelo winning his fights, it's the margin of victory he's given by some judges. If you take the worst score card in each of his fights vs trout, Lara, and cotto, they have Canelo winning 30 of the 36 rounds in those fights. Meanwhile, an argument can be made that any of those fighters could've won 6 rounds themselves in those fights but only giving the 3 of them a total of 6 rounds combined looks corrupt .
that doesnt make roaches cries that they were robbed and cotto won anymore valid thoughComment
-
I definitely don't think cotto was robbed but he definitely had no shot of winning a decision based on how the judges favored Canelo heavily. Even if he dropped Canelo 3 times in that same fight, he wouldn't have won a decision.Comment
-
What the **** were you watch, bro? Canelo rolled the vast majority of Cotto's punches, he landed more, and landed cleaner. This fight was closer to a shut out than a robbery.I thought the result of that fight was disgusting , I'm with Roach on this one , cotto should of won that fight on the score cards comfortably , but the judges are corrupt golden boy and their fighter canelo is worth more money so the judges must of been bought , no way did canelo win that fight , yes he threw the harder punches when he did land in some rounds but he did not win enough rounds , cotto's ring generalship was better, his defence was better , his jab landed more , he was robbed completely . And making fun out of Roach and Parkinson's you nasty people it could happen to you , Parkinson's effect motor skills and body movements it does not effect thought process thinking or judgement , stop being cruel.Comment
-
Cotto didn't outbox **** against Canelo. Stop embarrassing yourself.You sir need your head and eyes checked, Cotto gave Canelo one of the best fights he's had, even with the weight difference, Cotto was able to withstand Canelo's hard punches, he boxed better and had better movement and the flatfooted Canelo, he outpointed Canelo, yes Canelo was the one with the harder punches, obviously, he was the bigger man, the only reazon people saw him wining was because Cotto's punches didn't have an effect on Canelo, and we all know weight was the reason for that, still Cotto gave Canelo a boxing lesson and the only reason Canelo won was because of the corrupt judges and GB deep pockets with their golden goose.
So if Cotto is done and irrelevant, and gave Canelo a boxing class, where if there had been fair judges it would have gone a draw or a win for Cotto, what does that make Canelo and all his previous opponents?Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment