Brook made a living fighting IBF mandatories..why not Spence?

[LacedUp]

Horrible attempt at humor. I get it though, people don't want to call a spade a spade in this situation. I understand that Brook wants money fights from here on out. So why not just simply let the IBF strap go and chase his big payday fights since Spence isn't it?

Because obviously he wants to see if those money fights can be made. If not, then he will defend his belt as its still a big selling point in future fights.

[_Maxi]

Because Spence is black and Brook is a racist.

[hhs661]

Because obviously he wants to see if those money fights can be made. If not, then he will defend his belt as its still a big selling point in future fights.

How much longer can you chase 1 man when it's clear he has no intent, interest or need of wanting to face you? Does he not understand that he's being done to him, what he's doing to Spence?

[Kigali]

Because Spence is black and Brook is a racist.

Well we know you are.

The ****s ran to Argentina because they knew they'd be plenty catholic mestizos like you to worship them.

[Kigali]

Because obviously he wants to see if those money fights can be made. If not, then he will defend his belt as its still a big selling point in future fights.

He's just trying to dodge Spence and another ass-kicking.

the guy that stabbed him should have cut his throat.

[OnePunch]

Brook gets stripped if he doesn't fight Spence.

Let that sink in.

but but but a-side bidness doe

let that sink in

[OnePunch]

for the record I do believe that Brook should agree to fight spence, or go ahead and vacate. Making the kid sit while he tries to get the Khan fight is weak.

But I dont think that Larry should be the one making a big rallying cry about mandatories. Floyd went YEARS without doing a mando, and when fighters like GGG honor their mandatory commitments all they get from Larry and some others is scorn and ridicule. But now that its HIS guy thats on the wrong end of it, suddenly its this big outrage.

It just comes off as hypocritical

[Larry the boss]

for the record I do believe that Brook should agree to fight spence, or go ahead and vacate. Making the kid sit while he tries to get the Khan fight is weak.

But I dont think that Larry should be the one making a big rallying cry about mandatories. Floyd went YEARS without doing a mando, and when fighters like GGG honor their mandatory commitments all they get from Larry and some others is scorn and ridicule. But now that its HIS guy thats on the wrong end of it, suddenly its this big outrage.

It just comes off as hypocritical

Floyd did actually fight his mandatory in Guerrero and got slammed for it....GGG fights his mando's sure...It is like you and others dont understand why i post what i post....I have seen GGG fans agreeing with Brook for not fighting his mando while they preach mando's with GGG, Same posters slammed Floyd for Guerrero tho...so which is it?? and dont mention floyd and mando's if you arnt going to mention Manny..neither even had to fight mando's because they were bigger then the belts.AND WHEN DID SPENCE BECOME MY GUY???

[FrankieBruno]

Brooks entire career is a sham, i can't believe Spence has him this terrified

Its a winnable fight for Brook

[Kigali]

but but but a-side bidness doe

let that sink in

He'll be the a side without a title if he doesn't fight Spence.

let that sink in.