Originally posted by Kigali
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Broner: Fighting Spence Would Be "Foolish" for Crawford's Career
Collapse
-
Originally posted by daggum View Postmaidana was not highly regarded at the time that he fought broner. you are trying to revise history and make him seem like some of huge challenge based on the result of the fight. was he a walkover? no. but was he one of the best ww's in the world? no.
kigali said he moved up to a stacked division but no one included maidana and malignaggi as part of that stacked division so how does that prove he has balls? if ggg moved up and fought 2 guys who weren't considered good he would have balls? don't think so.
salido was #2 in his division when loma fought him and salido didn't even make weight. maidana was #9 i believe and had recently moved to 147 just like broner.
WW was an incredibly deep division so being a top 10 ww is not the same as being atop 10 MW or HWT, divisions that are weak.
Its ok to hate Broner, but he deserves credit. He went up and fought Maidana who was a tough veteran. When he found himself losing he didn't quit (although he did try to milk a low blow) and fought to try and win.
SInce he couldn't fight the TR guys, what else was he supposed to do?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rudiamonds View PostWhy does a unified champion at 140 need to go up 7 pounds to fight a contender?
If Crawford goes up it to fight a champion like the winner of Thurman vs Garcia or pac
This fight doesn't need to happen for atleast 2018-19 when Crawford settles in 147 and spence get a name or two on his side
I agree with all 3 points.
best post in the thread
Comment
-
Originally posted by 123tommy View PostCrawford had issues with Gamboa's power.I'd test the waters first
Comment
-
Terence Crawford ain't sweating anyone at jr welter or welter, that much is clear. Guy's got a ridiculous skill set in his own right, what does he have to fear? Don't get me wrong, Spence is the truth too, but if the money was right, I don't imagine either having a problem with this fight.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boxfan83 View PostI get what you are saying but my question is why is it when people have an opinion on PBC the question is ALWAYS diverted back to TR, GBP, HBO, etc? Why not comment on the question or comment in its context instead of diverting the answer elsewhere? PBC has a huge stable of fighters with big names and lots of up and coming talent, so its no wonder the opinions run high when fans dont get what expected.
2/27: Frampton vs. Quigg
4/16: Glowacki vs. Cunningham
4/16: Spence Jr. vs. Algieri
4/30: DeGale vs. Medina
4/30: Jack vs. Bute
5/21: Charlo vs. Trout
5/21: Charlo vs. Jackson
6/11: Provodnikov vs. Molina
6/18: Fonfara vs. Joe Smith Jr.
6/18: Payano vs. Warren
6/25: Thurman vs. Porter
7/2: Herring vs. Shafikov
7/29: Stevenson vs. Williams
7/30: Santa Cruz vs. Frampton
7/30: Garcia vs. Rojas
9/9: Easter vs. Comney
12/10: Charlo vs. Williams
12/10: Cuellar vs. Mares
Are all of these "must see TV?" NO! But is the quality less than TR, GBP, Roc Nation, or K2? NO! I want to see PBC succeed, and continue to do things like Thurman vs. Garcia on CBS! That's how you make the sport better! You can't make the sport better by charging us $70 for everything!
Comment
Comment