Since when did spence become the boogeyman?

[The Big Dunn]

Dude is so transparent.

Why doesn't he just come clean? If he posted:

I am tired of Americans hyping up their own and not non Americans.

Ok, If that annoys you, fine. We all get that.

But to over exaggerate a few people going gaga over Spence because the same people don't do that for GGG and others he likes is ridiculous.

[Madison Boxing]

You shouldn't have let these boys peer pressure you into responding. What an awful post.

Beterbiev was a very good amateur, but as a pro, you're judging him based on skill rather than achievement, correct? Plenty of top amateurs haven't made it as pros, I believe Beterbiev will make it, but that's my opinion, he has to prove it, just like Spence. And Spence was also a top amateur despite being a late starter (15 I believe).

The truth is, like somebody said earlier on this thread, you don't want see somebody beat Brook more impressively than your idol, which is quite disturbing. That's the only reason I can think of as to why you don't support Spence like you do other exciting power punchers.

You people are complete fruitcakes. You make absolutely zero sense.

its a big difference. Its why loma was worthy of the hype, cause weve seen how good he was in the amatuers. There was excitement from the moment beterbiev turned pro. It just seems almost random as to why out of all the young prospects, this guy spence is geting hyped such a crazy amount and theres no basis for it. As i said earlier, i wouldnt mind so much if you alls tuck by this fighters when they lose, but you dont. Andre dirrell, j rock, gary russell, adrien broner, all thrown on the dump once they lost and that 0 went. In fact this remind me of the broner hype, people were genuinely thinking he was going to beat floyd!!! The next pound for pound number1, the heir to the throne! Then he loses, and all the fans jump off the bandwagon and attach themselves to a new fighter. Now its spences turn to get ridiculously hyped.

[The Hammer]

But to over exaggerate a few people going gaga over Spence because the same people don't do that for GGG and others he likes is ridiculous.

To be respected, Errol Spence needs to take on an opponent under age 40 next time he fights.

Last opponent age 42: http://boxrec.com/boxer/304351

[The Big Dunn]

To be respected, Errol Spence needs to take on an opponent under age 40 next time he fights.

Last opponent age 42: http://boxrec.com/boxer/304351

I hope this means you have me off ignore.

I think if he fights and defeats Brook in his next fight, despite the fact Brook took a huge payday to get his face beaten up in his last fight, that will be respected.

[The Big Dunn]

its a big difference. Its why loma was worthy of the hype, cause weve seen how good he was in the amatuers. There was excitement from the moment beterbiev turned pro. It just seems almost random as to why out of all the young prospects, this guy spence is geting hyped such a crazy amount and theres no basis for it. As i said earlier, i wouldnt mind so much if you alls tuck by this fighters when they lose, but you dont. Andre dirrell, j rock, gary russell, adrien broner, all thrown on the dump once they lost and that 0 went. In fact this remind me of the broner hype, people were genuinely thinking he was going to beat floyd!!! The next pound for pound number1, the heir to the throne! Then he loses, and all the fans jump off the bandwagon and attach themselves to a new fighter. Now its spences turn to get ridiculously hyped.

No one jumped off Broner when he lost. People got upset with him because he didn't take the sport seriously outside the ring.

[-MAKAVELLI-]

big fan of that kid...he's must-watch tv for this fight fan

[WesternChamp]

but that's not true other that are not Floyd fans are hyping both fighters and many is kid of past his prime so that not out of the question

no their not. aside from the floyd fans, nobody is hyping crawford and spence.

[John Locke]

its a big difference. Its why loma was worthy of the hype, cause weve seen how good he was in the amatuers. There was excitement from the moment beterbiev turned pro. It just seems almost random as to why out of all the young prospects, this guy spence is geting hyped such a crazy amount and theres no basis for it. As i said earlier, i wouldnt mind so much if you alls tuck by this fighters when they lose, but you dont. Andre dirrell, j rock, gary russell, adrien broner, all thrown on the dump once they lost and that 0 went. In fact this remind me of the broner hype, people were genuinely thinking he was going to beat floyd!!! The next pound for pound number1, the heir to the throne! Then he loses, and all the fans jump off the bandwagon and attach themselves to a new fighter. Now its spences turn to get ridiculously hyped.

Lomachenko was one of the best amateurs of all time and a two time Olympic gold medalist, Beterbiev isn't anywhere near that accomplished. And like I said, not all top amateurs make it as pros. Lots of people had doubts about whether or not Loma would transition well enough into the pro game, he has PROVEN that he's an elite pro, Beterbiev has not. As usual you're using one fighter to shield another.

People are excited about Spence because he looks a very good talent (he's a contender now, not a prospect), but it's nothing crazy, you're just exaggerating again. People just want to see him get his shot at Brook, why do you get so defensive about that? You want him to prove himself, yet you don't seem too keen on seeing him fight Brook?

[WesternChamp]

one was a title fight that algieri did not deserve and the other was a step up fight that some said he was going to lose

does that change the fact that algieri is spence's best win up to date? the same algieri that pac got zero credit for beating already.

[VERSION1 (V1)]

no their not. aside from the floyd fans, nobody is hyping crawford and spence.

Dan Rafael has been hyping both guys for a while now