Well one was getting beat by Camacho and KO'd by Norris and the other was p4p king and schooling his opposition at an even older age. I guess 4 wins overshadow everything else for certain fighters though... I thought resume was the whole thing. Leonard also got beat by a smaller fighter in his prime but since it was Duran and he avenged it it somehow gets overlooked. I would take Floyd's career, money, and health over Leonard's... which one would you rather have?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who has a better resume, Sugar Ray Leonard or Floyd Mayweather?
Collapse
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by Elroy The Great View Postduran (1l), hearns, (shot) hagler and (hyped) benitez. these 4 names are supposed to equal 10000000 names. who else is there
may has more mid level wins than srl and spent more time at the top.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TBear View PostHearns went on to become light middleweight champ, middleweight champion, super middleweight champ and two time light heavyweight champion. Not sure where you get the idea he was shot when Leonard beat him. Even Benitez went on to upset Hope(reigning Jr. middle champ) and defended the title beating Duran. Those mentioned names put Leonard at another level, even if some refuse to see it. There were others though, Kalule was an undefeated champion, Andy Price at the time Leonard fought him, was the only fighter that had victories over both current world champions at the time, Palomino and Cuevas. Leonard though still young, took him out in one round.
duran, hearns, (shot) hagler, (hyped) benitez.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elroy The Great View Posthagler was shot. those other names are just fillers. its not so much a one sided thread if an honest fight fan were to look closer.
duran, hearns, (shot) hagler, (hyped) benitez.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TBear View PostI won't argue that Hagler was at the end. He however was undisputed champion and at the top of the p4p rankings at the time. Leonard was a tremendous underdog. Leonard was inactive for quite awhile and shown nothing that would suggest he would last with a beast like Hagler. Imagine if Mayweather came back after two years inactivity and pulled off the upset against Golovkin after Golovkin unified every title. That is the best way of creating the picture so newer fans could understand the achievement.
''i will never fight that man.''
hagler was done vs mugambi.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elroy The Great View Postwhat sticks out most about the hagler srl fight was srl comment~
''i will never fight that man.''
hagler was done vs mugambi.
When Leonard suffered a detached retina he retired, He made a return after a layoff(two years) and fought Howard(Kevin). He did not good and stated the Hagler fight will never happen. Three years later, he pulled off a tremendous comeback, regardless if some consider controversial, over a top fighter in the world. For that and other reasons as stated, comparisons like this are unfair. If fans want to compare Mayweather they should chose other fighters than Leonard, Ray Robinson and the like. There are other superb fighters to measure against that bring a better comparison.
Comment
Comment