Tweet
Im confused, keep getting mixed messages. All i hear is that GGG is a hype job, hes unproven, hes slow, hes not fought anyone good, his defence is ****, he got lit up by a welterweight.
If what you were saying is true and brook (a blown up welterweight) exposed golovkin and lifted him off his feet with an uppercut, then christ whats jacobs going to do to golovkin, should demolish him if golovkins defence is that easy to penetrate. This should be really easy work for a fighter like jacobs then and i was expecting you all to pick him to win, should make some nice money at the bookmakers too.
Yet then i read the threads and comments on here, very few people seem to be giving much of a chance to jacobs, seems as if posters have the started the classic damage control tactics, by downplaying jacobs. 'so what if ggg wins, hes expected to'. Expected by whom, you lot who said GGG isnt any good? Whys that?
So im pretty confused, you all seem to think its a bit of a mismatch when golovkin fights jacobs (a world level fighter). On the one hand im told GGG is overrated and hes no good, but on the other hand im told someone like jacobs (a world class middleweight) doesnt pose any threat at all? So that must mean the people who trash golovkin must actually rate golovkin pretty ****ing highly.
Can someone clear this up for me? Cause its almost as if you lot just make this **** up as you go along (who would have thought it...)
If what you were saying is true and brook (a blown up welterweight) exposed golovkin and lifted him off his feet with an uppercut, then christ whats jacobs going to do to golovkin, should demolish him if golovkins defence is that easy to penetrate. This should be really easy work for a fighter like jacobs then and i was expecting you all to pick him to win, should make some nice money at the bookmakers too.
Yet then i read the threads and comments on here, very few people seem to be giving much of a chance to jacobs, seems as if posters have the started the classic damage control tactics, by downplaying jacobs. 'so what if ggg wins, hes expected to'. Expected by whom, you lot who said GGG isnt any good? Whys that?
So im pretty confused, you all seem to think its a bit of a mismatch when golovkin fights jacobs (a world level fighter). On the one hand im told GGG is overrated and hes no good, but on the other hand im told someone like jacobs (a world class middleweight) doesnt pose any threat at all? So that must mean the people who trash golovkin must actually rate golovkin pretty ****ing highly.
Can someone clear this up for me? Cause its almost as if you lot just make this **** up as you go along (who would have thought it...)
Comment