Will the Golovkin haters give him credit if he KOs Jacobs?

[The Hammer]

I don't believe they will.

[Reloaded]

I don't believe they will.

He is expected too isnt he ?

[The Hammer]

He is expected too isnt he ?

If he's expected to KO Jacobs, doesn't that mean GGG must be a very good fighter?

[lopetego]

Ofc they won't give him credit

he's the wrong colour and the wrong nation for them

that's not gonna change after he KO's Jacobs

[Outwest Exp 355]

I don't even think he needs to KO Jacobs. Jacobs isn't a perfect fighter but he's a legit contender that earned a shot.

[Ce1ska]

Not until he fights Ward at 175.

[The Hammer]

Not until he fights Ward at 175.

Even then, they would not. They'd just say "Ward is shot".

Remember they said Benn and Eubank were shot after Steve Collins beat both of them twice, even though Collins was two years older than Eubank and the same age as Benn.

[Willy Wanker]

No, they won't.

Jacobs was the second best MW in the world, but now Golovkin haters label him a glass chinned bum with cancer. He's an easy fight of a sudden.

They're already discrediting if her were to win and Golovkin hasn't even fought him yet.

[NaijaD]

Jacobs is somewhere in the region of an 8 to 1 underdog because Golovkin is that good or that far ahead of the pack at MW (also DJ is chinny, worst Achilles heel to have against GGG).

It's a good win for Golovkin but not one that can't easily be discredited by someone that doesn't like him.

[Rip Chudd]

He'll get credit for beating the second best MW in the world. The question is can GGG fans admit that Jacobs seems to be a bit chinny?