Originally posted by Eastcoast
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GGG is champion in the weakest MW division in history
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
And then you got
Tarver
Ronald Wright
Pavlik
Calzaghe
Taylor
Pascal
Shumanov
Kovalev
Dont compare GGG to Hopkins because GGG hasnt fought anybody considered elite , Id love to see a 50yr old GGG fight a prime Kovalev lol , he is too busy side stepping Ward while in prime let alone fight them at 50 .
Put it all into perspective and GGG does not qualify to carry Bernards gym bag .
why are you bringing up fights that didn't take place at MW.. I'm strictly speaking of Hopkins at 160, his biggest wins were two small guys that fought him in his division.
this is Hopkins resume after the RJJ defeat in 1993: Roy Ritchie, Wendell Hall, Melvin Wynn, Lupe Aquino, Segundo Mercado (twice), Steve Frank, Joe Lipsey, William Bo James, John David Jackson, Glen Johnson, Andrew Council, Simon Brown, Robert Allen (twice), Antwun Echols, Syd Vanderpool, Antwun Echols, Keith Holmes, Felix Trinidad, Carl Daniels, Morrade Hakkar, William Joppy, Robert Allen, Oscar De La Hoya, Howard Eastman, Jermain Taylor (twice, 2 Losses)
GGG runs through this list undefeated winning every fight by knockout.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Metho_4u View PostTom? Is that your lying azz?
10 million is a lowball offer? Where's he gonna make that now exactly? For someone who's working "in and around the sport" you're pretty ******
yes, a flat fee of 10MM for a fight that will likely do a million buys or more is a lowball offer. when the fight is finally made, GGG will make a lot more than 10MM.
it's easy to say someone is ******. but can you prove it? either my positions have merit or they don't. your opinion of me personally is irrelevant. but it is very common for those of lower intelligence to assume the other person is ****** when they finally encounter someone of advanced intelligence.
if you feel the need to compare intellectual credentials, we can do that. but it wouldn't turn out well for you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Metho_4u View PostHopkins made 10 million to Oscar's 30 when they fought, what kind of draw is golovkin to demand more? He's a nobody in the sport...as much as his fans would like to think otherwise.
hopkins had fought for 350K the year before. so his drawing power then was nowhere close to GGG's drawing power now.
GGG is going to sell out MSG as the A side in march. hopkins was never that level of attraction.
Comment
-
it truly is a piss poor resume.
what about
rocky ?
tyson ?
gatti ?
etc...
http://www.ibhof.com/pages/about/inductees/modern.html
Comment
-
only 3 guys have pieced together the WBC/WBA/IBF middleweight titles. hagler. hopkins. GGG (yes i realize taylor lucked into facing someone that had already spent the time unifying).
yes, GGG's resume is currently lacking superfights. that will change when he KOs canelo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SugarRayCurtain View PostThis guy has the worst resume in MW championship history in arguably the weakest MW division in history
He won't make ATG status or HOF status, his greatest win will be forever Daniel geale or Jacobs if he wins
97k PPV buys? The regular youtuber who has a decent YouTube channel gets more views than that per vid
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by DeLorean View Postthe only reason people say 160 is "weak" is because Golovkin is destroying opponents ..if he was winning by decision nobody would tell him to move up. the division was also "weak" during the reign of Bernard Hopkins but nobody urged him to go up because he was winning on points. .if Trinidad and Oscar never moved up to 160 nobody would remember who Hopkins was..two small guys moving up is what made him known. .Jacobs, Lemieux, Murray, Geale, Stevens, Monroe, Brook are all solid opponents.
Everybody thought Oscar lost to Sturm. He looked horrible in that fight and was pretty badly beat up. People talk about robberies on this forum....THAT was a robbery.
Trinidad was a decent win but he was the smaller man and he was definitely a plodder. He never amounted to much at middleweight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by original zero View Posti don't know who tom is. sorry.
yes, a flat fee of 10MM for a fight that will likely do a million buys or more is a lowball offer. when the fight is finally made, GGG will make a lot more than 10MM.
it's easy to say someone is ******. but can you prove it? either my positions have merit or they don't. your opinion of me personally is irrelevant. but it is very common for those of lower intelligence to assume the other person is ****** when they finally encounter someone of advanced intelligence.
if you feel the need to compare intellectual credentials, we can do that. but it wouldn't turn out well for you.
And, you are indeed ****** if you think that fight would do 1 million buys lmao! Cotto vs Canelo did 900k and again NO ONE knows who the **** golovkin is. He sounds like the schoolyard bully ******....1 million buys...lmao again. Get your fanboy dreams out of your azz.
Comment
Comment