I barely remember the Norwood fight and I've only seen it once like 3 or 4 years ago.
As for the John fight, it was far from a robbery. In fact, all this robbery rubbish which has been pushed by the boxing media is deceitful. There was only one American journalist at the fight...possibly the only western journalist around at ringside. He scored the fight for John and is reportedly in line with most other journalists present: i.e. it was a win for John although the fight was somewhat close.
Most of the idiotic posters on here who claim it was a robbery probably haven't even watched the fight. JMM was getting really desperate and landed low shots, ended up with 2 point deductions, now in a competitive fight, which everyone agrees it was, by what margins is a guy supposed to have been robbed if he had already lost 2 points? Are we to believe John only won 3 or 4 rounds?
The JMM being robbed myth has sprung up around pretty much every fight he's lost. The first Pac fight for instance should have been a win for Pac because one of the judges scored the opening round incorrectly so ended up with a draw lol yet it's JMMs camp and fans that complained. The second fight was a pretty obvious victory for Pac.
Heck, theres idiots on here who even claim the Bradley fight was a robbery. Apart from the Bradley fight, you could say JMM has lost some close decisions but no robberies in reality.
I feel he won the 3rd Pac fight but again, it was close enough to be considered for Pac.
As for the John fight, it was far from a robbery. In fact, all this robbery rubbish which has been pushed by the boxing media is deceitful. There was only one American journalist at the fight...possibly the only western journalist around at ringside. He scored the fight for John and is reportedly in line with most other journalists present: i.e. it was a win for John although the fight was somewhat close.
Most of the idiotic posters on here who claim it was a robbery probably haven't even watched the fight. JMM was getting really desperate and landed low shots, ended up with 2 point deductions, now in a competitive fight, which everyone agrees it was, by what margins is a guy supposed to have been robbed if he had already lost 2 points? Are we to believe John only won 3 or 4 rounds?
The JMM being robbed myth has sprung up around pretty much every fight he's lost. The first Pac fight for instance should have been a win for Pac because one of the judges scored the opening round incorrectly so ended up with a draw lol yet it's JMMs camp and fans that complained. The second fight was a pretty obvious victory for Pac.
Heck, theres idiots on here who even claim the Bradley fight was a robbery. Apart from the Bradley fight, you could say JMM has lost some close decisions but no robberies in reality.
I feel he won the 3rd Pac fight but again, it was close enough to be considered for Pac.
Comment