Comments Thread For: Povetkin's Drug Test From December 13 Comes Back Clean
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Stiverne was under no obligation to fight Povetkin after his failed test, same as Povetkin when Stiverne popped dirty. Balls and character don't enter into this.Comment
-
Stiverne tested positive for a banned substance that wasn't a PED. PEDvetkin tested postive for a banned substance that is said to be comparable to anabolic steroids. Stiverne also isn't making excuses about his second positive test in a year. Stiverne wants an even playing field, and people like you want to see fighters risk their lives against juicers.Comment
-
A stimulant is a PED. We can't start picking and choosing which banned substances are more acceptable to be popped for than others. If it's on the WADA list and you get caught using it you should be held accountable.Stiverne tested positive for a banned substance that wasn't a PED. PEDvetkin tested postive for a banned substance that is said to be comparable to anabolic steroids. Stiverne also isn't making excuses about his second positive test in a year. Stiverne wants an even playing field, and people like you want to see fighters risk their lives against juicers.Comment
-
Comment
-
Good post here, doe!
Also - huge fan of your name!
Lol made me think of the HW journeyman that is used as a stepping stone to transition boxers from the F/D level, to the C level: Owen "WHAT THE HECK" Beck. Hahah, that's seriously his real moniker!Comment
-
Ostarine is a drug you continually take everyday. Taking it once a week will have no benefit at all.
It makes no sense that he would test clean before and after the dirty test. These tests can't be as accurate as people think.Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 12-24-2016, 10:32 PM.Comment
-
Why do they keep acting like if you test positive one day & test negative at some later date its all good? Thats f#cking ******ed.
These tests can be passed & that guys are being caught at all in the lead in to a fight just shows me guys are willing to take risks to use banned substances in that lil window they are being tested in boxing currently. Any guy who really knows what they are doing would be using banned substances BEFORE that 6 week or whatever window is open to receive the benefits of a banned substance without the risks. In fact if I was in boxing & using banned substances I wouldn't agree to any VADA or USADA testing til I had a equal or better testing outcome of my own that said I would come up clean. I mean ffs even my ****** cousin is smart enough to buy one of those ****ty pee tests for jobs & comes up clean on that before going down to take "the mans" piss test to get a new gig at Walgreens.Comment
-
Everyone is a banned substance expert nowadays lol.
Jeff Novitsky was just on Mark Bell's podcast (Mark Bell is a former PED using powerlifter along with his now deceased former pro wrestling brother & were both featured in their other brothers doc, Bigger Faster Stronger about PEDs awhile back that you probably heard of). It was an extremely insightful talk about PED tests, testing & protocol. I'd recommend it for anyone curious about the process. Novitsky who is with the USADA has popped 30ish UFC guys in the 18ish months he's been policing the UFC under its 24/7/365 testing system. Meanwhile boxing keeps with this bs ass few weeks before a fight testing for a small minority of fighters & most cats are still doing just post fight Walgreens job level piss tests which shouldn't be catching anyone with two brain cells to rub together & people defend some of these guys without understanding how this **** even works.It makes no sense that he would test clean before and after the dirty test. These tests can't be as accurate as people think.
And f#ck man I'm ultimately pro banned substances, but if we are making rules about banned substances people should be abiding by them or they should get suspended if not banned from the sport.Comment
Comment