You dont get it. You cant use an argument without backing it up. lol
Why do you come to the conclusion that Dibella, Arum and King (Who is irrelevant right now) can provide golovkin with 3-4 fights? That was my initial criticism.
I cant just made a statement like "Golovkin should go to caribe prormotions (who are incompetent), because Loeffler cant deliver 4 fights a year" without using examples where I can justify my statement.
And in the same breath, you just made a statement, which I questioned, because there are no instances to back your claim up.
And: "They dont have fighters who want to fight 4 times, but if they had, they totally would provide them with the opportunities" is not a valid argument."
Why do you come to the conclusion that Dibella, Arum and King (Who is irrelevant right now) can provide golovkin with 3-4 fights? That was my initial criticism.
I cant just made a statement like "Golovkin should go to caribe prormotions (who are incompetent), because Loeffler cant deliver 4 fights a year" without using examples where I can justify my statement.
And in the same breath, you just made a statement, which I questioned, because there are no instances to back your claim up.
And: "They dont have fighters who want to fight 4 times, but if they had, they totally would provide them with the opportunities" is not a valid argument."
Comment