Is Gennady Golovkin P4P number 1 if he KOs Jacobs?

[Nay_Sayer]

Where is Jacobs on the p4p list?

Exactly.

There's nobody @ 160 or even 168 who Bumlokvin could beat that puts him @ #1 P4P. He'd have to go up and beat one of the top guys @ 175 in order to be in the conversation, IMO...

[satiev1]

Got him 2nd in my list currently, if he does a real number on jacobs then yeah, i'd probably have him top. Hes the most dominant champion in the sport, that for me is enough to justify consideration for being pound for pound number 1. Sorry if that upsets the sad bunch of parasites that ruin this forum but it is what it is..

The argument that who did he beat in the p4p list to be p4p is ******ed as 90 percent of the p4p list didn't beat any fighters on the p4p rankings. Same people that discredit the rankings are the same people who mention the list when it comes to ggg. Who did gonzalez beat in the p4p to be p4p number 1?

[Madison Boxing]

The argument that who did he beat in the p4p list to be p4p is ******ed as 90 percent of the p4p list didn't beat any fighters on the p4p rankings. Same people that discredit the rankings are the same people who mention the list when it comes to ggg. Who did gonzalez beat in the p4p to be p4p number 1?

yeah exactly ^ and a lot of the people *****ing and moaning have crawford in there top 3, he sure as hell hasnt beaten anyone in the top 20 pound for pound lol

[Rock&Roll]

Exactly.

There's nobody @ 160 or even 168 who Bumlokvin could beat that puts him @ #1 P4P. He'd have to go up and beat one of the top guys @ 175 in order to be in the conversation, IMO...

Ummmm... what is the reason for a p4p list again?

Oh that's right, to judge each boxer in their respective weight class. If SRR had a weak division but HW was strong, he doesn't have to fight at HW to be best p4p, this is the fundamental reason for P4P. Otherwise, why have a theoretical list - just get everyone to fight each other, including chocolatito vs joshua.
Some divisions are weaker than others, and for that reason, you have to use your eyes. Looking at resumes on boxrec to find p4p is not the way to do it.

[icha]

The argument that who did he beat in the p4p list to be p4p is ******ed as 90 percent of the p4p list didn't beat any fighters on the p4p rankings. Same people that discredit the rankings are the same people who mention the list when it comes to ggg. Who did gonzalez beat in the p4p to be p4p number 1?

Gallito estrada, that alone trumps anything on gggs ****y resume..

[just the facts]

Got him 2nd in my list currently, if he does a real number on jacobs then yeah, i'd probably have him top. Hes the most dominant champion in the sport, that for me is enough to justify consideration for being pound for pound number 1. Sorry if that upsets the sad bunch of parasites that ruin this forum but it is what it is..

I know your pea sized brain is clouded with man love for g string and you would gladly provide oral gratification to g string upon demand, but you just can't claim that the most dominant champion in boxing is a fighter with exactly ZERO quality wins so far.

[World Champion?]

If Golovkin gets a 1st round KO and Gonzalez either loses or sc****s out a close win then Golovkin might have a shaky claim on the #1 spot until the Ward-Kovalev rematch.

[IFightDirty]

Not for me IMO. GGG is in about most peoples top 5 p4p which is a bit high IMO but a win over Jacobs would definitely justify him being in the top 5. Jacobs isn't a p4p fighter so I dont think its a good enough win to elevate him to #1 p4p. I mean shoot, look at Ward. He beat another fellow p4p fighter in Kovalev and even that wasn't good enough to put him #1.