Comments Thread For: Golovkin vs. Jacobs Deal Done - March 18 at MSG, HBO PPV

[aboutfkntime]

Good. Some of the villageidiots here now has a massive crow to eat. Funny how they say Jacobs is GGG's best opponent. I bet that come april, those same guys will tell you how overrated that bum jacobs was and that he hardly makes GGG's 10 best opponents list.

not sure if I have heard anyone say that ?

Jacobs is a very good fighter, so that will be a very good win should Golovkin beat him.

but Jacobs will not be Golovkin's best win imho

[GMAN SUPREME]

Who's that sweet piece of ass in your sig?

you mean that water buffalo.

[kingstip9]

Good fight.
Golovkin by stoppage inside of 6

[aboutfkntime]

I'v never said GGG ducked. I'm one of the only Ward fans that will say GGG didn't duck him. I know the difference between a duck and a fight not being financially beneficial or the risk isn't worth the reward. I've always blamed Loeffler and will continue to. Even with the Canelo situation I'm putting the blame on Loeffler.

not duck, avoid.....

there were in different divisions after-all

INTENTIONALLY creating the public appearance of interest (mentioning Ward, all of that 154-168 stuff, etc)..... but then stating that they were willing to fight Ward for 50/50 IF he accepted a catchweight that they KNEW he could never make...... AND then two months later refusing his offer in 36 minutes flat and saying "maybe 2017".....

..... all made it pretty obvious to me that they wanted nothing to do with Andre Ward, despite all of the shht talk

as usual, Team Bullshht created that situation with their shht-talk..... so yea, we will have to disagree on that one

GGG was willing to fight everyone at 168 EXCEPT for Ward..... and that is the very nicest way that I could phrase it.

[Metho_4u]

I think this will have bigger numbers than the Golovkin vs. Lemieux.

GGG is more well known now than he was when eh fought Lemieux.

No he's not, they thought he was a star then, and still think it...What's in common here? They're both bull****. Ppv is gonna severely bomb.

[Metho_4u]

good stuff, jacobs found his balls, good on him. Theres going to be a lot of salty posters on here and a lot of mention of pirog in the next few months! All i can say is haters, you got what you wanted and hes fighting the guy you all said he was scared of!!! Damn that really must hurt you!!! Whats your next line of attack going to be, that hes ducking lara??? Can take your hate and shove it up your arses

Could've gotten 10 million for Canelo too lol dumbazz

[GGG Gloveking]

Could've gotten 10 million for Canelo too lol dumbazz

I though it was $15M now. And he still can, can't he? Canelo never claimed to want to fight before September anyway

[Metho_4u]

if featherfisted mora knocked him down,imagine what a punch from ggg will do

And if brook could snap triple Vs head back, what can Jacobs do to him?

[aboutfkntime]

Exactly. Jacobs is at best an average fighter. Don't care if I forget the day of the fight to be honest.

Substitute Jacobs for Ward, then we are talking.

that is kinda like discrediting Golovkin's win already ?

Jacobs is a good, to very-good, fighter..... imho

MUCH better than Golovkin's recent opposition

yes, Golovkin should still be overwhelming favorite..... but that is because he is very dominant at middleweight

Jacobs is not established, true..... and he simply cannot be described as a great win, or even as Golovkin's best win imho..... but I will give Golovkin credit for a very-good win IF he beats Jacobs..... and I think he will

Golovkin detractor's have (rightly) been demanding this fight..... not really fair to shht on it now that the paperwork has been signed

I'm just glad that GGG is finally doing something meaningful

[Tomjas]

not sure if I have heard anyone say that ?

Jacobs is a very good fighter, so that will be a very good win should Golovkin beat him.

but Jacobs will not be Golovkin's best win imho

I know it's a thin resume but who would you rate higher

I suppose that you could say Murray or Geale but I believe Jacobs is better than both so ....