Comments Thread For: Hopkins: Why is it Time? Nobody's Laughing at Me Anymore

[hugh grant]

Tito beat Joppy at 160, that's it..i don't know about you but i'll pick Brook over Joppy at 160..all those other accomplishments from Tito at 147 and 154 mean **** when it comes to my argument..my thing is Tito was the smaller guy that came up to face Bhop, he got destroyed..that was Bhop's biggest win as a middleweight..he was in the same boat GGG is currently in, a weak 160 division with the only big names being guys smaller than him that climbed up.

I'm not saying Brook is better than Tito, I'm saying both fights are cases of the smaller man moving up to face natural middleweights..one win is praised, the other bashed. .thats all I'm asking , why is Golovkin vs Brook bashed.

I think the standards for GGG are higher than BH. I mean Tito was fave agaist BH. So BH was underappreciated at that time. BH hadn't done too much. Many thought BH had fought bums like they do GGG.
Tito was considered excellent win four BH. Brook should be considered a good win at the very least. In a fair world that is. But is this world fair and unbiased? Unfortunately not

[b Murphington]

Idk how anyone can hate on B Hop. Truly the last of a dying breed.

He is a true definition for longevity.

[Tobi.G]

Hopkins is a legend but i think tonight hes getting KOed.

Well.......