Comments Thread For: De La Hoya Vows To 'First Take' - "Canelo vs. GGG Will Happen"

[Lou Cipher]

http://www.tmz.com/2016/12/04/oscar-...ingle-divorce/

ANOTHER LINK OF YOUR DRUNK CRACKHEAD HERO

Arent drug addicts not supposed to drink?

[GMAN SUPREME]

canelo doesnt need to make consessions, but still his is willing to fight at gggs desired weight(a weight canelo never fought before)...

not to fight ggg. he wanted golovkin to fight him at a catchweight of 155 for the middleweight title you ass.he then made excuses about how he needed a couple of fights to get "acclimated to 160" now all of sudden he's ready to fight at 165 super middleweight. its a joke

[JASON SHAW]

arent drug addicts not supposed to drink?

that makes no sense.....

[Lou Cipher]

that makes no sense.....

It was rhetorical anyway, you ****** ass. GBP or get a job.

[BigStomps]

Lmfao u are hopeless buddy

I'm not your buddy punk!
You are an idiot!

[aboutfkntime]

Yeah, Felix Sturm was THE MAN at 160 when GGG was defending that regular title, and everybody knows it.

nah, Martinez was..... Sturm was the REAL WBA champ LMAO

btw, I just want to take the time to school you up on how boxing works.....

if fighter-A happens to be the champion, then fighter-B arrives on the scene and YOU happen to think that fighter-B could beat fighter-A..... that means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING until they actually fight, you do know that..... right?

just saying.....

kinda like Pacquiao and that 8-division rubbish

the reason why you cannot refer to Pacquiao as an 8-division champ is not because of his bullshht catchweight fights with Margarito/Cotto, or because of his lame title fights with Diaz/Hatton..... it is because he did not actually win a title at featherweight

he may have beaten the man, but that was not a title-fight..... and awarding Pac a title that was never actually at stake is ridiculous fanboy "feel-good" rubbish

I can easily say that Burley should have been champ, doesn't make it true

you guys are ignorant wankers for co-signing Golovkin breaking Hopkins record by defending an interim title against bums and no-hopers

[aboutfkntime]

It was so!

GGG won't get a fight with Canelo till Sept 2017, whether he signs Oscar's alleged offer immediately or not.

all I am saying is..... you do not have the right - or the knowledge - to insinuate that offer was a "bluff", when your guy could have simply called that "bluff", but he decided not to..... AGAIN

keyword = AGAIN

that would be..... yea, bullshht

Golovkin is not a bluff-caller, he has never done it once

[kafkod]

nah, Martinez was..... Sturm was the REAL WBA champ LMAO

btw, I just want to take the time to school you up on how boxing works.....

if fighter-A happens to be the champion, then fighter-B arrives on the scene and YOU happen to think that fighter-B could beat fighter-A..... that means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING until they actually fight, you do know that..... right?

just saying.....

kinda like Pacquiao and that 8-division rubbish

the reason why you cannot refer to Pacquiao as an 8-division champ is not because of his bullshht catchweight fights with Margarito/Cotto, or because of his lame title fights with Diaz/Hatton..... it is because he did not actually win a title at featherweight

he may have beaten the man, but that was not a title-fight..... and awarding Pac a title that was never actually at stake is ridiculous fanboy "feel-good" rubbish

I can easily say that Burley should have been champ, doesn't make it true

you guys are ignorant wankers for co-signing Golovkin breaking Hopkins record by defending an interim title against bums and no-hopers

Why do you keep telling the same lie over and over? None of GGG's 17 defences were for an interim title ... not one.

And are you aware that GGG offered to fight Sergio Martinez in Argentina, for 15% of the purse, and was turned down?

[kafkod]

all I am saying is..... you do not have the right - or the knowledge - to insinuate that offer was a "bluff", when your guy could have simply called that "bluff", but he decided not to..... AGAIN

keyword = AGAIN

that would be..... yea, bullshht

Golovkin is not a bluff-caller, he has never done it once

Sept 17th 2017 at the earliest, son. Remember that and stop sweating.

[aboutfkntime]

Why do you keep telling the same lie over and over? None of GGG's 17 defences were for an interim title ... not one.

And are you aware that GGG offered to fight Sergio Martinez in Argentina, for 15% of the purse, and was turned down?

interim, regular, ****..... whatever you want to call it is fine